On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Raphael Bircher <r.birc...@gmx.ch> wrote: > Am 12.07.13 16:32, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: > >> What is not serious that I plan a 72 hr vote that is normal at Apache? >> We are not loner an incubator project and 72 hr are enough. The RC is >> not so much different than the snapshot before. > > The point is, who has desided to make a RC? I don't find a single > discoussion about it. A RC should be discused on the list. I know, there
The detailed proposal and discussion was in this thread, from June 19th, three weeks ago: http://markmail.org/message/4wzawtnxaruvztqm -Rob > where serios testings, but for my point of view not enoght. IA2 is > integrated same days befor, so the QA has no chance to find regressions to > this part of code. > > I work with 4.0 since same week. It is not bad, but I personaly think there > are still same serios bugs in. You can't find this potential Errors within > 72 hours. > > I find it wrong to annonce a RC without public discoussion if the Version is > RC ready. And the stabilization phase was far to short. > > Well, I can nothing else do as search same showstoper for RC1. But even I > don't find one, I will vote -1. I'm sorry, I can't put my name under a > Release under this condition. > > Greetings Raphael > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
