On Mar 9, 2013 3:18 PM, "Andrea Pescetti" <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: > > janI wrote: >> >> That does not (as I read it) state that we can bypass RTC for >> non-committers. Allowing non-committers access is one thing, but allowing >> them to change the source (in this case text) directly is quite another. > > > Sure. The setting for new volunteers would be: > > 1) No paperwork, no ICLA, just create an account on Pootle > > 2) Translate through suggestions (equivalent to contributing patches) > > 3) RTC in place (i.e., strings are committed after a review by a committer, exactly as it happens now; what a "review" is in this context will vary, as it is now, depending on availability and skills of volunteers).
that is perfectly within the ruleset. I thought the reason for local users was - get their work named or - allow them to do review (not possible on suggestions) or - save committers work as you suggest I cannot see the difference to using anonymous as we have it today ? What did I miss ? making support for non-ldap users is no trivial task (just think of spam protection) so clearly this effort should counter weighted of other advantages. rgds jan i > > Regards, > Andrea. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
