On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 09:51:25PM +0100, Hagar Delest wrote: > And have you read my previous message? I don't understand why there > is almost nothing aired when there are talks about breaking the > compatibility of ALL the extensions because of a minor issue. And here > you're challenging a change that will affect very few users. > > You told in your first message that you were concerned that the change > would break the backward compatibility. But are you not concerned by > all the users having their extensions deactivated by a minor API > change???
That change is in the configuration schema, not in the API; so, this isn't an API change. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina
pgpAdwSIyiW7l.pgp
Description: PGP signature
