Le 10/02/2013 17:07, Rob Weir a écrit :
But it is not question of mathematics. It is a question about how we
make controversial changes and how we keep the ecosystem informed
about breaking changes.   Hiding behind one (but not the only)
mathematical convention for this calculation avoids dealing with the
fact that a broken changes was checked in without any review on this
list and without any attempt to inform users and application
developers about it.  I hope we agree that this should not be how we
do things.

Agreed. But for the 0^0 issue, you were very verbose against such a change, 
when it affects very few users whereas for the broken extensions issue, that 
would affect a good deal of users (perhaps millions), you were just asking 
about how to communicate. Nothing said about the comments from Bernard and 
Hans. The difference in the handling of both issues is what I find rather 
strange.

Hagar

Reply via email to