On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Hagar Delest <hagar.del...@laposte.net> wrote: > Le 10/02/2013 17:07, Rob Weir a écrit : > >> But it is not question of mathematics. It is a question about how we >> make controversial changes and how we keep the ecosystem informed >> about breaking changes. Hiding behind one (but not the only) >> mathematical convention for this calculation avoids dealing with the >> fact that a broken changes was checked in without any review on this >> list and without any attempt to inform users and application >> developers about it. I hope we agree that this should not be how we >> do things. > > > Agreed. But for the 0^0 issue, you were very verbose against such a change, > when it affects very few users whereas for the broken extensions issue, that > would affect a good deal of users (perhaps millions), you were just asking > about how to communicate. Nothing said about the comments from Bernard and > Hans. The difference in the handling of both issues is what I find rather > strange. >
Did you not notice the title of this thread? Has it entirely escaped you that we're talking about 0^0 here? If you want to start another threat about extensions, then go ahead and I will comment there. But anyone of the intelligence of a grapefruit would not find it strange that I am discussing only 0^0 in this thread. -Rob > Hagar
