Oliver, Thanks for your comments! Please see my comments below. - Shenfeng (Simon)
2012/11/22 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <orwittm...@googlemail.com> > Hi, > > > On 21.11.2012 15:25, Shenfeng Liu wrote: > >> Hi, all, >> I created a wiki to show some fidelity improvement samples since AOO >> 3.4.1 in our current build: >> http://wiki.openoffice.org/**wiki/Documentation/Fidelity_** >> Improvement_Since_AOO341#**OOXML_Support<http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Fidelity_Improvement_Since_AOO341#OOXML_Support> >> The purpose of this wiki is to promote our significant fidelity >> enhancements with shining samples. Of course not all the >> enhancements/defect fixes can be included in this wiki. >> Thanks to Jian Yuan Li, Lei Wang, Jian Hong, Zhe Wang and Ying Zhang >> and >> other people who send me a lot of good samples. I didn't finish the wiki >> yet. While any comments are welcome. >> >> > Cool stuff - Thanks for the effort so far. > I am looking forward to see all these kind of improvements presented like > this. > > > For now I have 2 questions: >> >> 1. I think the contents in this wiki should be in the release notes of our >> coming 4.0. Maybe a link to this wiki page from release notes? Any >> suggestion? >> > > Yes, such things should go into our Release Notes. > From my point of view these improvements should be directly in the Release > Notes - they should be made very visible to the users who will checkout > what is in the next release. The compare of screenshots is an easy way for > our users to get an idea of the improvements. > Thus, we can use this wiki as one of the input sources for our Release > Notes. Agree. While I saw the discussion on 3.5 vs 4.0 and cwiki vs mwiki is still on going. And later we may need to figure out a new release notes template for the rich contents. So for now I will continue to work on the current wiki page, and move to new place later when we agree on the way. > > > 2. Currently I can not upload the file of docx, pptx or xlsx. I wonder if >> any one can help to add them to the permission list? >> > > As far as I can see for all improvements we have an Bugzilla issue. > Thus, I think it is enough to have the sample files attached to the > Bugzilla issues - no need for duplicates. If the samples are attached to > the Bugzilla issue you can provide a direct link to it - e.g. link to > sample file of issue 119963 - > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=78258 > Good suggestion! Only problem is that in some defects the original attachment is complex, and developers made simple samples for me. But I can try this way. And attach the simple samples back to the defects. > Best regards, Oliver. >
