You mean excluding parts of the community from participating in the
decision-taking processes?

2012/7/16 Adrian Crum <[email protected]>

> No, it smells like the current goal of moving things we don't want in the
> main project to external projects. This type of decision-making has been
> going on for years.
>
> -Adrian
>
>
> On 7/16/2012 9:45 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
>
>> I agree with Ruth. This sounds like a user requirement. And the community
>> should decide on this.
>>
>> Furthermore, the remark 'users might like a new feature, but that doesn't
>> mean the dev community wants it in the project' smells like measuring with
>> double standards; as if the meritocratic principle doesn't apply when the
>> committers don't want it in. Or as if changes always get in, when only the
>> committers want it.
>>
>> 2012/7/15 Adrian Crum 
>> <adrian.crum@sandglass-**software.com<[email protected]>
>> >
>>
>>  Ruth,
>>>
>>> I understand your viewpoint. Personally, I prefer to present my ideas to
>>> the dev list to see if it is something the dev community wants included
>>> in
>>> the project. Users might like a new feature, but that doesn't mean the
>>> dev
>>> community wants it in the project. If there was no interest from the dev
>>> community, then I would offer it as an add-on product and announce it on
>>> the user list.
>>>
>>> I am also a user, and the design was based on the requirement to monitor
>>> and control server performance. I suppose I could go to the user list for
>>> more ideas, but the code I'm planning to commit is pretty basic, and
>>> users
>>> will be free to enhance it in whatever way they please.
>>>
>>> -Adrian
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/15/2012 12:13 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi Adrian:
>>>> Shouldn't this be discussed on the "user" list? IMHO Words like
>>>> "applications" and "stats about services and entities"...those are all
>>>> indicative of user requirements, not developer requirements.
>>>>
>>>> Users should be driving requirements gathering and analysis for OFBiz
>>>> and
>>>> not developers.
>>>> Just my 2 cents.
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Ruth
>>>>
>>>>
>
>

Reply via email to