I see that the TWI patch is merged, thanks for everyone involved.
As for the driver - PR #17405 - user jerpelea left a comment with a
request to resolve conflicts. Did a quick check, seems that another
sensor driver was merged so it probably won't be that difficult to
resolve. I can certainly do it but the question is if the driver is not
getting rejected anyway because of the old interface issue.
On 2025-11-30 16:46, Tomek CEDRO wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2025 at 4:38 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-11-29 18:19, Tomek CEDRO wrote:
> Some more typos caught:
> ...
> I fixed them already lets see the CI status now :-)
thanks for fixing those typos - I ran the patches through a
spellchecker
but there was a lot of false positives (NuttX, AVR, register names
etc.)
so unfortunately some things hid among them and got missed.
no worries :-)
> Raiden already reaised an issue on GH about floats in uORG and there
> is a proposition to use fixed point built time alternative, please
> take a look here:
>
> https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/10644
>
> I will start a mailing list discussion in a moment this seems important
> :-)
I did two quick tests with a code that reads data from I/O port (to
force data to be unknown at a build time so the compiler cannot
optimize) and does sprintf with it. Second test added division by 10
to
the first one.
(..)
thank you for valuable feedback, i copy pasted to uorb mailing thread,
please join discussion over there :-)
I see that the first (bugfix) branch is already merged - thanks for
the
help.
thank you for valuable fixes and contributions! :-)
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
