On Sun, Nov 30, 2025 at 4:38 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2025-11-29 18:19, Tomek CEDRO wrote: > > Some more typos caught: > > ... > > I fixed them already lets see the CI status now :-) > > thanks for fixing those typos - I ran the patches through a spellchecker > but there was a lot of false positives (NuttX, AVR, register names etc.) > so unfortunately some things hid among them and got missed.
no worries :-) > > Raiden already reaised an issue on GH about floats in uORG and there > > is a proposition to use fixed point built time alternative, please > > take a look here: > > > > https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/10644 > > > > I will start a mailing list discussion in a moment this seems important > > :-) > > I did two quick tests with a code that reads data from I/O port (to > force data to be unknown at a build time so the compiler cannot > optimize) and does sprintf with it. Second test added division by 10 to > the first one. > (..) thank you for valuable feedback, i copy pasted to uorb mailing thread, please join discussion over there :-) > I see that the first (bugfix) branch is already merged - thanks for the > help. thank you for valuable fixes and contributions! :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
