I've got:
- Raspberry Pi Pico
- Raspberry Pi Pico W
- XIAO RP2040
- XIAO SAMD21
- Raspberry Pi 4B

And would also be willing to help test, provided it's easy enough for me to
automate.

On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 2:33 PM Tiago Medicci Serrano <
tiago.medi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> I wonder if that be really bad if we added miminal citest / selftes to
> > default configurations? Or this should stay minimal?
>
>
> I think one `citest` defconfig is totally different from the minimal
> configs. A minimal config is intended to be used by a user experimenting
> with NuttX and `citest` is meant to act as the reference configuration for
> testing that board.
>
> So we need to have an option where images are built on our IC and
> > downloaded to some low-power board (e.g. Raspberry Pi) to test the user's
> > boards and send the results to our IC.
>
>
> It depends on the design: I agree that the firmware should be built in a
> different "stage" and, depending on the build stage results, we can create
> a QEMU test (if not for every board, at least to test the architecture).
> Then, if successful, we can continue to the distributed hardware testing. I
> think that the first (build) and second (QEMU) stages can be made upstream.
> The last stage (HW test) is distributed. As we have successfully run two
> stages upstream, it would be safer to have it tested on our machines.
>
> Em qui., 6 de fev. de 2025 às 15:30, Alan C. Assis <acas...@gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>
> > I think we can ask people to suggest some names and we can select the
> best
> > name.
> >
> > Something to keep in mind about this distributed (build) system:
> >
> > Not everyone has free electricity (solar panels) to run a computer server
> > 24/7. And a solution where the server owner only runs it occasionally
> won't
> > help.
> >
> > So we need to have an option where images are built on our IC and
> > downloaded to some low-power board (e.g. Raspberry Pi) to test the user's
> > boards and send the results to our IC.
> >
> > This way it will be more flexible and more people could contribute.
> >
> > BR,
> >
> > Alan
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 3:02 PM Tomek CEDRO <to...@cedro.info> wrote:
> >
> > > Folks, Alan noticed there is already project named drunx :-(
> > >
> > > https://github.com/alxolr/drunx
> > >
> > > ..and the name is not really serious :D For me its just a working
> > > slur, so if you have a better idea for name please share :-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to