On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 10:01 AM raiden00pl <raiden0...@gmail.com> wrote: > Testing everything as a final goal is OK, but right now it's a waste of > resources.
We are thinking ahead, planning, so anyone can attach whatever they want / have / can port tests to, not to assume limits right from start :-) Yes we will start with one board, then two boards, then three, whoever wants to add more they are free to do so it they have time and resources :-) > I think it's much more productive to select the minimum number of boards > that give > the greatest coverage for the code. Exactly, lets start pointing out the boards that we care about, not on the limit of the boards :-) I did provide list of the board that I have in the online sheet, which one we want to run on? :-) ARM? * STM32* ARM64? * rPI* RISC-V? * ESP32-C3. * Sopgo. XTENSA? * ESP32* ??? :-) > > It seems it is already spread over many various emails and github > issues. I think emails are good for discussions, while github is good > for noting conclusions down. But if you like Confluence we may try it > why not :-) > > This is exactly the problem with email. This is not the first time these > topics are > discussed. Similar discussions and ideas have already been here. Where are > they now? Somewhere in dozens of emails over the years that I can't even > find. > Email for discussion and decision-making - OK, email as a knowledge base > and > an organized place with content - not really. Lets just make small prototypes, small measurable steps. GitHub for bullet point notes / hints / tasks / conclusions :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
