Hi Andrew, This is a nice idea!
So, currently these two are the most critical issues, right? Best Regards, Alan On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 8:44 PM Andrew Dennison < andrew.denni...@motec.com.au> wrote: > Hi Alan, > > We have reported the main problems we have observed in the example issues > mentioned below (#9840 and #11189) and also have some open PR for > performance related features. Our desire is to focus our team on product > functionality so we would like to offer to fund someone to help with any > Nuttx challenges we have so we can get them resolved without relying on > community members to generously donate their time. > > In #9840, for example, we provided an example that demonstrates something > we observed but also suspect that the Linux Test Project _may_ also be > useful to confirm if this is a Nuttx problem. > > As you mentioned, having something in ostest to detect the issue and verify > the fix / catch regressions would be ideal. > > Kind regards, > > Andrew Dennison > Chief Architect and Hardware Team Lead > > On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 at 04:18, Alan C. Assis <acas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > Could you please open a public issue to report these issues (case you > > haven't yet). > > > > Also if you have some testing examples to trigger these issues, we could > > include it into our ostest to avoid it happening again. > > > > BR, > > > > Alan > > > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 3:45 AM Andrew Dennison < > > andrew.denni...@motec.com.au> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Nuttx community, > > > > > > We are actively working with nuttx and RISCV (RV32) and have > contributed > > > several PR to improve support for kernel mode with litex: > > > > > > > > > https://nuttx.apache.org/docs/latest/platforms/risc-v/litex/cores/vexriscv_smp/index.html > > > . > > > > > > Along the way we have identified several issues and would like to offer > > to > > > pay for someone with appropriate experience to investigate and upstream > > any > > > fixes identified. Some examples: > > > > > > Experiencing possible race condition with pthread_cond_timedwait. #9840 > > > <https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/9840> > > > Unexpected behaviour with poll and tickless scheduler #11189 > > > <https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/11189> > > > > > > Please contact us directly if you feel you could help with either of > > these > > > issues or potentially some of the other recent issues here: > > > https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues?q=is%3Aopen+author%3Ag2gps+ > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > Andrew Dennison > > > > > > > -- > *MoTeC Pty Ltd* > > 121 Merrindale Drive > Croydon South 3136 > Victoria Australia > *T: *61 3 9761 5050 > *W: *www.motec.com.au <https://www.motec.com.au/> > > > -- > <http://www.facebook.com/motec.global> > <http://www.youtube.com/user/MoTeCAustralia> > <https://www.instagram.com/motec_global/> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/motec-global> > > > -- > <https://www.motec.com.au> > > -- > > > Disclaimer Notice: This message, including any attachments, contains > confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose > and > is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient you should > delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this > message or the taking of any action based on it is strictly prohibited. >
