Hi Andrew,

Could you please open a public issue to report these issues (case you
haven't yet).

Also if you have some testing examples to trigger these issues, we could
include it into our ostest to avoid it happening again.

BR,

Alan

On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 3:45 AM Andrew Dennison <andrew.denni...@motec.com.au>
wrote:

> Hi Nuttx community,
>
> We are actively working with nuttx and RISCV (RV32) and have contributed
> several PR to improve support for kernel mode with litex:
>
> https://nuttx.apache.org/docs/latest/platforms/risc-v/litex/cores/vexriscv_smp/index.html
> .
>
> Along the way we have identified several issues and would like to offer to
> pay for someone with appropriate experience to investigate and upstream any
> fixes identified. Some examples:
>
> Experiencing possible race condition with pthread_cond_timedwait. #9840
> <https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/9840>
> Unexpected behaviour with poll and tickless scheduler #11189
> <https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/11189>
>
> Please contact us directly if you feel you could help with either of these
> issues or potentially some of the other recent issues here:
> https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues?q=is%3Aopen+author%3Ag2gps+
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Andrew Dennison
> Chief Architect and Hardware Team Lead
>
> --
> *MoTeC Pty Ltd*
>
> 121 Merrindale Drive
> Croydon South 3136
> Victoria Australia
> *T: *61 3 9761 5050
> *W: *www.motec.com.au <https://www.motec.com.au/>
>
>
> --
>  <http://www.facebook.com/motec.global>
> <http://www.youtube.com/user/MoTeCAustralia>
> <https://www.instagram.com/motec_global/>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/motec-global>
>
>
> --
>  <https://www.motec.com.au>
>
> --
>
>
> Disclaimer Notice: This message, including any attachments, contains
> confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose
> and
> is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient you should
> delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
> message or the taking of any action based on it is strictly prohibited.
>

Reply via email to