On Fri, Mar 20, 2020, 8:01 AM Gregory Nutt <spudan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> We CANNOT just go and update the headers on files unless Greg is the > only > >> author and all other non trivial contributors have signed some form of > >> CLA. I would feel very uncomfortable signing off on a release without a > >> review of these files that got changed, disclaimer or not. > >> > > Is it enough that if the following criteria meet: > > 1.The file is BSD license > > 2.The file is created by Greg > > 3.The file state that Greg is one and only one owner > > Then we can convert it's license to Apache. > > This was stated by a mentor in the past. So, based on that, yes, I > believe that that is all that is required. This is not accurate based on what Justin has said and goes against what I know about OSS licensing. This is exactly why we have CLAs, the copyright header does not give you rights to my contribution. I would love to be wrong, so if a mentor can comment on this please correct me. --Brennan
