On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:37 PM Brennan Ashton <bash...@brennanashton.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020, 7:29 AM Nathan Hartman <hartman.nat...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 9:45 PM Brennan Ashton <bash...@brennanashton.com> > > wrote: > > > Adam if you look back I have a hosted instance of it running for the > > > project, no sense in duplicating the work. I'm happy to provide you an > > > account. The nice thing about using this is that the reports can be > > shared > > > publicly and we can use the proper flow of working through the identified > > > license and copyrights and then marking them as resolved. > > > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to nudge (or pehaps push and shove) Apache NuttX toward > > making our first release as an Apache podling. Along those lines I'd > > like to revive this conversation... > > > > > Personally I got a little turned away on this when we had the conversation > to work on this and start a path forward and immediately PRs got merged > including one I commented on that violated the plan. This is a difficult > task and we should not be making it harder on ourselves. > > We CANNOT just go and update the headers on files unless Greg is the only > author and all other non trivial contributors have signed some form of > CLA. I would feel very uncomfortable signing off on a release without a > review of these files that got changed, disclaimer or not. >
Is it enough that if the following criteria meet: 1.The file is BSD license 2.The file is created by Greg 3.The file state that Greg is one and only one owner Then we can convert it's license to Apache. It's almost impossible to finish the license job if we need review the history line by line to identify all contributors who make the non trival change. > --Brennan > > >
