+1

especially for the commits and notifications, so they can be filtered. I'm
ok with separate lists for commits and notifications, I just want them to
be separate from the lists meant for humans :)



On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 9:01 AM Alin Jerpelea <jerpe...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
> this will remove the noise for most users
>
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2019, 17:27 David Sidrane <david.sidr...@nscdg.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > >* notificati...@nuttx.apache.org: For all notifications from GitHub,
> > GitBox, Confluence, Jira, etc., etc., etc.
> >
> > But I would separates commits@ from notifications@
> >
> > I made similar suggestions but it appears flood has swept away the key
> > points.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nathan Hartman [mailto:hartman.nat...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2019 7:16 AM
> > To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: User Email Account
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 9:34 AM Gregory Nutt <spudan...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > There have been quite a few NuttX users who have been put of by the
> > > volume and content of emails on this list.  December is not quite over
> > > and there have been close to 850 emails so far this month.  And the
> > > majority of the community is only interested is discussion technical
> > > issues and do not even care about the project-oriented content.
> > >
> > > So I wonder, would it be good to have a u...@nuttx.apache.org mail
> list
> > > just for user-facing questions?  I see that many other projects have
> > > such an email account.  This would allow people to have simple
> > > discussions about the OS without the organizational/political content.
> > > Such an email would be a replacement for the Google email list.
> > > dev@nuttx.apache.org is not.
> > >
> > > Does this sound like good idea?  Or should should we continue to force
> > > users to wad through 100s of emails that they do not way to see?
> >
> > Yes, we didn't anticipate so many emails!
> >
> > It's good that we have a lot of participation but we did get quite a
> > few complaints about volume.
> >
> > Perhaps an arrangement like this would allow people to take control of
> > the situation:
> >
> > * dev@nuttx.apache.org: For development of NuttX itself, including
> > organizational discussions.
> >
> > * u...@nuttx.apache.org: For users of NuttX, who are usually
> > developers themselves, but they're downstream developers who use NuttX
> > in other products.
> >
> > * notificati...@nuttx.apache.org: For all notifications from GitHub,
> > GitBox, Confluence, Jira, etc., etc., etc.
> >
> > (By the way, I expect that once the dust settles, we have consensus on
> > a workflow, and we "find our groove," the volume of organizational
> > emails should drop substantially and most emails on dev will center
> > around technical discussions once again. But it might take a while...)
> >
> > Thoughts?
> > Nathan
> >
>


-- 
Adam Feuer <a...@starcat.io>

Reply via email to