> The dev list traffic may reduce after we finish the workflow discussion.
> but email from GibBox will become more and more, can we send them to
> rev...@nuttx.apache.org to avoid the review message mess up the dev
> list?

While reading some projects' board reports, I came across this:

> Gitbox traffic is now going to issues@. The community was losing dev@
>  subscribers because of the high volume of traffic from Gitbox.

Once we are all set up and ready to receive patches/PRs, we may run
into the same issue.


On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 1:34 PM Xiang Xiao <xiaoxiang781...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The dev list traffic may reduce after we finish the workflow discussion.
> but email from GibBox will become more and more, can we send them to
> rev...@nuttx.apache.org to avoid the review message mess up the dev
> list?
>
> Thanks
> Xiang
>
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 8:19 PM spudaneco <spudan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I may grumble a bit bur I always follow Justin's advice.I do think that
> > NuttX is diferent from other new podlings because  began with a huge user
> > base and has a few different needs on day 1 as a mature project.I don't
> > believe that finding new committers will be a problem.Sent from Samsung
> > tablet.
> > -------- Original message --------From: Adam Feuer <a...@starcat.io> Date:
> > 12/26/19  1:23 AM  (GMT-06:00) To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re: User
> > Email Account I think what Justin is saying is that it's going to seem like
> > uncomfortablechaos for a bit, but will eventually settle down into a better
> > state.From what I know about well-functioning teams, that seems right.
> > Form,storm, norm,
> > perform.<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuckman%27s_stages_of_group_development>
> > :)cheersadamOn Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 8:28 PM Justin Mclean
> > <jus...@classsoftware.com>wrote:> Hi,>> Most of those are not current
> > incubating projects. Some of them did not> become to level projects. Just
> > about all did not start with user lists.> Creating a seperate user list this
> > early in previous incubating projects> has slowed or hindered their
> > community growth. You want users involved so> that they become committers.
> > At no point have I said you can't do this but> the PPMC needs to carefully
> > consider it. My Internet access is limited> right now but if you search on
> > the incubator general list you'll see> several discussions on this.>>
> > Thanks,> Justin>-- Adam Feuer <a...@starcat.io>

Reply via email to