On 08/04/2011, at 3:38 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > I asked Cobertura-dev. Crickets. > > I think that Brett's position is that we're good to go, but it can't > hurt to check in with the management. > > Brett?
My understanding is that at this point, it's purely a policy decision of this project. I think as long as the code developed here remains licensed under a business friendly license, then we should just continue as is. We may want to note on the site that for those intending to use or distribute the source code (as opposed to using the plugin), that the licensing of cobertura is complicated and they should seek their own advice. However, I don't think we should make a habit of depending on GPL code, and let's not accept new plugins since there is already apache-extras, github, etc. for that. Do others agree? - Brett -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
