On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As far as I'm concerned, we can take the software under the most
> liberal license available (AL 1.1) and ignore the GPL license entirely
> for our purposes.
If Larry's view is that using GPL'ed code in general is something then
I am inclined to believe him. However, these words don't sound to me
like he did really grab the situation: Cobertura is *not* dual
licensed. Some parts of it are ASL 1.1, but others are GPL'ed.
--
I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
