Morning everyone,
first I would like to thank everybody who participated in the vote [*1] about lifting the required Java version to 21 for Maven 4.0.0.

The vote has ended with the following votes:

--------------
Binding votes:

+1: Sylwester Lachiewicz, Karl Heinz Marbaise, Tamás Cservenák, Benjamin Marwell, Arnaud Héritier, Tibor Digaňa

-1: Michael Osipov, Maarten Mulders, Olivier Lamy, Slawomir Jaranowski, Hervé Boutemy


Non-binding votes:

+1: Gary Gregory, Mateusz Gajewski, Mantas Gridinas, Rodrigo Bourbon, Willker Gomes, Hans Aikema, Martin Desruisseaux, Torsten Heit, Sandra Parsick, Dawid Law, Philipp Picej, John Neffenger, Jeremy Landis, Daniel B. Widdis, Michael Bien, Gregorz Grzybek, Kévin Buntrock, Jorge Solorzano, Mark Derricutt, Matthias Bünger, Basil Crow, Romain Manni-Bucau, Thomas Sundberg, Anders Hammar, Piotr P. Karwasz, Niels Basjes, Enrico Olivelli

-1: Elliotte Rusty Harold

--------------

5 out of 11 binding votes are -1 with valid arguments, including that there is no actual need to upgrade, that (it's too late, as ) we are already in RC phase, and that it might put on new constraints to users. The vote was (in line to the vote about lifting Maven 4 to Java 17) a "procedural majority vote", meaing a simple majority of binding votes would be enough to considered it to be passed. But due the high number of negative votes and brought up arguments, I don't think we should ignore them but take them into consideration for the benefit of the Maven community. Therefore I call the vote to be non successful. We can reevaluate in the future, including having a closer look at / discussion about the benefits and constraints of raising the Java version.


Wish you a happy sunday!
Matthias

[*1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/mjbx64vlbd346ov3l4wj6fy9vh8608vr


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to