Hi, Ian Lynch wrote:
>On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 00:56 +0200, Cristian Driga wrote: > > > >>I would've loved if you had looked in the existing to-dos, if you had >>checked what others tried to bring new using the wiki lately and helped >>them where you could. But no, seems that moving a site around is more >>important to you. >> >> > >I think that is a bit unfair given how much work Daniel has done on >supporting OOo overall. > What? This is a joke right? What did he do, seriously? I mean, what did he do on OpenOffice.org that didn't disrupt, flame or do anything else than that here? I'm trying to recall myself what he did but I really can't. > Like me he is pretty busy at the moment with >work so not much time for more than monitoring and seeing what is going >on. In the context of the current debate his suggestions are not >particularly outrageous but are not likely to be realised for all the >same historical reasons. So on that I agree with you Cristian, best to >drop it. > >I personally think that the best solution is to carry on developing the >Wiki and let Steven develop his site with the help of anyone that wants >to help. See what happens. In the end quality should prevail. > > Charles. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
