On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 09:03 +1000, Jean Hollis Weber wrote: > Whether any of that means we should change the name of the > product is a different question. But the arguments for keeping > the "org" don't impress me at all.
The main argument is really that its too trivial an issue to waste any resources on. I'd say if there is any significant cost at all its not worth it. There are far higher priorities. BTW, I used the same thing with the INGOTs. www.theINGOTS.org. Why? It tells everyone the URL so they can easily remember where the web site is. I had to use theINGOTs because INGOTs was taken. Interestingly I just did a Google search for INGOTs and it comes up with Premier Ingots and Metals Golden Ingots Chinese Symbols of Wealth www.theingots.org/ So I don't think either the name or URL is any significant disadvantage even though you could say theINGOTs.org is awkward. I was told by a professional marketing person from IBM I just had to change the name. Unless the name is just outrageous, once it gets known that's all that matters. I mean who would choose IBM as a trade name if it wasn't made famous already? International Business Machines International Grades in Office Technology Hmmm... -- Ian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ZMS Ltd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
