Frando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hallo,
> - more static site, no public user managment, no bulletin
> boards. End-user-information and link collection. Maybe affiliate
> system.
I'm for this one.
> - more dynamic site with possibilty for everyone to register
> and add content (blogs). Community style with bulletin
> boards. Affiliate system.
It's time to think what is the site's goal.
a) Inform people about OpenOffice.org, tell them how to convert all
documents from Microsoft Office, where to download, how to
install and list of categorized things.
b) Group people and let them work on anything, ... If this is the
goal, what is your plan with oooforum.org, ooodocs.org, ...?
I have a feeling that these dynamic things will duplicate
existing sites.
> - via the i18n-module. This would mean, that sOOo would be
> a multiliangual website, so it would be ONE website for ALL
> countries. Each peace of content (called "node" in drupal) can be
> translated into every language. The user sees only the content in the
> languages he specified. Affiliate- and usersystem would be
> worldwide.
I'm affraid that this will lead to the MandrakeClub.com where I have
lot of articles in four languages. If I select just one language,
I've got very few articles if this is not the main language.
> Espacially if we'd chose the second way (independent sites) we would
> NEED people from each country willing to create content and to be in
> charge of the page.
You will need people for bot alternatives, because someone have to
translate content of your site. The truth is, that the first version
is less time-consuming.
> But now it's getting difficult .. which propsals shell I realize?
Hmmm, try to answer question - what is the spreadopenoffice.org site
goal? If you'll know answer, it's quite easy to make decission.
Cheers,
Robert
--
Robert Vojta
http://blog.vojta.name/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
