Justin Clift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hallo,
> That kind of seems wrong. We're aiming at end users' aren't we? yes, but don't underrate them. > Um, I'm not sure how you arrived at these two thoughts. Language barriers, too much work to handle and keep up to date multilingual site, ... Again, still the same example - compare MandrakeClub and mandrake.cz. Our users are visiting mandrake.cz, because of language, more useful info for them, ... Advanced users are trying to keep up to date MandrakeClub (translations) and all articles, but there is no success. I want to prevent this situation with spreadOOo. Maybe I'm wrong and the multilingual site will have a great success. Who knows, maybe it's time to try it. Even if we will try this, it's good to start with one site, make it perfect and then try to add one language and wait for what happens. > As a potentially valuable guide, do you feel we should ask the people > who successfully created SpreadFireFox, what they feel is needed to > build the same kind of success? I think it's worth to ask them, they can give you good advices and they can comment multilingual site idea too. Cheers, Robert -- Robert Vojta http://blog.vojta.name/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
