> > The prime effective operating size of a team is 5-8 members; and that's not > > anecdotal. > > Beyond that size becomes ungainly. Imagaine the number of permutations in > > communication channels alone. > > Absolutely. This is another reason why we should split up things into more > sub-projects and more lists. Each of which is manageable. From my > experience, the number 5-8 sounds about right.
Excellent idea --- possibly that's why OOo RegiCon went so well? That was about the number of people we had there. > http://www.math.umd.edu/~dcarrera/openoffice/distributed-development.sxd Crazy math guy :) -- Jason Faulkner ------------------------ OldOs.org Owner/Admin / http://oldos.org / [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------ Certified INGOTS Gold Assessor Trainer / http://www.theingots.org ------------------------ OpenOffice.org Marketing Volunteer / [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
