Seems this would be one reason to have a 7.7 release at the same time as
8.0. Aside from also tying the 7.x code line off with a bow, as Erick had
suggested, are there other features / improvements that warrant a 7.7
release around the January time frame?

On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 2:46 PM Toke Eskildsen <[email protected]> wrote:

> jim ferenczi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > That's a big patch and as you said it needs a proper review.
>
> Reviewing large patches is a problem in itself. I guess some baking time
> on master is a secondary alternative, which unfortunately does not fit into
> the idea of getting this in 7.6.
>
> > Considering that the release should be in two weeks I think we
> > shouldn't rush this in 7.6. That's my 2 cents but it also depends
> > if we do a 7.7 or not.
>
> That is one reason I am pushing this a bit. It would be quite a missed
> opportunity to not get this into 7.x at some point, as I know the
> reluctance to upgrade to new major versions.
>
> Thanks,
> Toke Eskildsen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
> --

Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP
Geospatial Software Guy  |  Elasticsearch
Apache Lucene Committer
[email protected]

Reply via email to