Thanks David for the explanation, I'll backport it as well then. Le lun. 11 janv. 2016 à 17:59, [email protected] < [email protected]> a écrit :
> Adrien, Mike: Thanks for working on a 5.4.1 release. > > IMO the bug you pointed out (LUCENE-2229) should be back-ported because I > can't imagine someone depending on this behavior. Its ultimately a bug in > the sizing of the fragment, and furthermore only occurs in infrequent > circumstances. > > RE Solr: The 5.3.1 changes ought to move to 5.4.1, since these changes > post-dated 5.4.0. Anshum what's the deal with 5.3.1? > > ~ David > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:48 AM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: > >> All changes in the "Bug Fixes" section of 5.5 of Lucene have been >> backported to 5.4.1 but https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2229 >> (thanks Mike for the help). The reason is that it changes the behaviour of >> the highlighter and I'm afraid that some users might be relying on or >> expecting this bug, so I'd rather fold it into a minor release than a >> bugfix release. >> >> I'm not really qualified to know if there are things worth backporting on >> the Solr side, so if you feel like some issues should be backported for >> this bugfix release, feel free to go ahead. >> > -- > Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker > LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: > http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com >
