Adrien, Mike: Thanks for working on a 5.4.1 release. IMO the bug you pointed out (LUCENE-2229) should be back-ported because I can't imagine someone depending on this behavior. Its ultimately a bug in the sizing of the fragment, and furthermore only occurs in infrequent circumstances.
RE Solr: The 5.3.1 changes ought to move to 5.4.1, since these changes post-dated 5.4.0. Anshum what's the deal with 5.3.1? ~ David On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:48 AM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: > All changes in the "Bug Fixes" section of 5.5 of Lucene have been > backported to 5.4.1 but https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2229 > (thanks Mike for the help). The reason is that it changes the behaviour of > the highlighter and I'm afraid that some users might be relying on or > expecting this bug, so I'd rather fold it into a minor release than a > bugfix release. > > I'm not really qualified to know if there are things worth backporting on > the Solr side, so if you feel like some issues should be backported for > this bugfix release, feel free to go ahead. > -- Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
