+1 from me as well. On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP Boyang! > > I don't have any further comments. > > +1 from me. > > @Ted: This is a rather simple KIP, thus, skipping the DISCUSS thread > seems ok to me. > > > > -Matthias > > > @Boyang: it's recommended to use this format for the subject > > "[VOTE] KIP-245: ..." > > Same for DISCUSS threads. People are used to those headlines and they > pay more attention than. For this KIP, just leave it as it though. For > future reference only > . > > > On 12/26/17 4:55 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > > Normally a DISCUSS thread precedes VOTE thread so that people have ample > time examining the proposal. > > -------- Original message --------From: Boyang Chen <bche...@outlook.com> > Date: 12/26/17 1:22 AM (GMT-07:00) To: dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: > Vote for KIP-245: Use Properties instead of StreamsConfig in KafkaStreams > constructor > > Hi there, > > > > I'm Boyang who is a newbie contributor to Kafka. I would like to start a > vote for the KIP-245: > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > 245%3A+Use+Properties+instead+of+StreamsConfig+in+KafkaStreams+constructor > > > > > > This is linked with JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/ > jira/browse/KAFKA-6386 > > > > [KAFKA-6386] Deprecate KafkaStreams constructor taking ...< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6386> > > issues.apache.org > > Currently, KafkaStreams constructor has overloads that take either > Properties or StreamsConfig a parameters. Because StreamsConfig is > immutable and is created from a ... > > > > And my pull request is here: > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/4354 > > > > > > Since this is my first time doing this, feel free to let me know if this > is the correct format! > > > > > > Best, > > > > Boyang > > > >
