Yes. A KIP needs 3 binding "+1" to be accepted. You can still work on the PR and get it ready to get merged -- I am quite confident that this KIP will be accepted :)
-Matthias On 11/4/17 3:56 PM, Matt Farmer wrote: > Bump! I believe I need two more binding +1's to proceed? > > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 11:49 AM Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) from me. Thanks! >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>>> The vote should stay open for at least 72 hours. The bylaws can be >> found >>>> here https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Bylaws >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Matt Farmer <m...@frmr.me> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello all, >>>>> >>>>> It seems like discussion around KIP-210 has gone to a lull. I've got >>> some >>>>> candidate work underway for it already, so I'd like to go ahead and >> call >>>>> it >>>>> to a vote. >>>>> >>>>> For reference, the KIP can be found here: >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-210+-+ >>>>> Provide+for+custom+error+handling++when+Kafka+Streams+fails+to+produce >>>>> >>>>> Also, how long to vote threads stay open generally before changing the >>>>> status of the KIP? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Matt >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> -- Guozhang >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> -- Guozhang >>> >> >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
