Bumping this thread so it’s visible given that the conversation on KIP-210 has converged again.
Current tally is 2 binding +1s, and 2 non-binding +1s. On November 8, 2017 at 12:26:32 PM, Damian Guy (damian....@gmail.com) wrote: +1 (binding) On Sat, 4 Nov 2017 at 16:50 Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> wrote: > Yes. A KIP needs 3 binding "+1" to be accepted. > > You can still work on the PR and get it ready to get merged -- I am > quite confident that this KIP will be accepted :) > > > -Matthias > > On 11/4/17 3:56 PM, Matt Farmer wrote: > > Bump! I believe I need two more binding +1's to proceed? > > > > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 11:49 AM Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >>> +1 (binding) from me. Thanks! > >>> > >>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>> The vote should stay open for at least 72 hours. The bylaws can be > >> found > >>>> here https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Bylaws > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Matt Farmer <m...@frmr.me> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hello all, > >>>>> > >>>>> It seems like discussion around KIP-210 has gone to a lull. I've got > >>> some > >>>>> candidate work underway for it already, so I'd like to go ahead and > >> call > >>>>> it > >>>>> to a vote. > >>>>> > >>>>> For reference, the KIP can be found here: > >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-210+-+ > >>>>> > Provide+for+custom+error+handling++when+Kafka+Streams+fails+to+produce > >>>>> > >>>>> Also, how long to vote threads stay open generally before changing > the > >>>>> status of the KIP? > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers, > >>>>> Matt > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> -- Guozhang > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> -- Guozhang > >>> > >> > > > >
