[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14705145#comment-14705145
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on KAFKA-2411:
---------------------------------------

GitHub user ijuma reopened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/151

    KAFKA-2411; remove usage of blocking channel

    

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/ijuma/kafka 
kafka-2411-remove-usage-of-blocking-channel

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/151.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #151
    
----
commit dbcde7e828a250708752866c4610298773dea006
Author: Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk>
Date:   2015-08-19T13:30:35Z

    Introduce `ChannelBuilders.create` and use it in `ClientUtils` and 
`SocketServer`

commit 6de8b9b18c6bfb67e72a4fccc10768dff15098f8
Author: Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk>
Date:   2015-08-19T14:22:55Z

    Use `Selector` instead of `BlockingChannel` for controlled shutdown

commit da7a980887ab2b5d007ddf80c3059b6619d52f99
Author: Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk>
Date:   2015-08-19T14:23:11Z

    Use `Selector` instead of `BlockingChannel` in `ControllerChannelManager`

commit 2b258901929e24fce2329bc85e650e4ca022bca0
Author: Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk>
Date:   2015-08-20T11:10:53Z

    Move `readCompletely` from `NetworkReceive` to `BlockingChannel`
    
    It is now a private method since it's not used anywhere else and it's
    been changed slightly to match the use-case better.

commit f804f633d93d2beea94017bba9225504c2f9cea4
Author: Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk>
Date:   2015-08-20T12:29:55Z

    Adjust buffer and max request size to match `BlockingChannel` behaviour
    
    Based on feedback from Gwen.

commit c71aab9b6e4c6172615a125d2406ff6f3d668996
Author: Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk>
Date:   2015-08-20T12:53:39Z

    Introduce specific methods in `SelectorUtils` and make the generic ones 
private
    
    As suggested by Gwen.

commit 1de16166232e0b9a4b0798de493869d3ce23964c
Author: Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk>
Date:   2015-08-20T13:17:45Z

    Reuse `Selector` when removing and re-adding brokers in 
`ControllerChannelManager`
    
    As suggested by Gwen.

commit bf5b9c81fa59efa2429a409d3872f4f6f0d5d589
Author: Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk>
Date:   2015-08-20T14:55:03Z

    Merge remote-tracking branch 'apache/trunk' into 
kafka-2411-remove-usage-of-blocking-channel
    
    * apache/trunk:
      KAFKA-2330: Vagrantfile sets global configs instead of per-provider 
override configs; patched by Ewen Cheslack-Postava, reviewed by Geoff Anderson 
and Gwen Shapira
      KAFKA-2246; Fix incorrect config ZK path.
      KAFKA-2084; trivial follow-up (remove JUnit3Suite dependency)

----


> remove usage of BlockingChannel in the broker
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-2411
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2411
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: security
>            Reporter: Jun Rao
>            Assignee: Ismael Juma
>             Fix For: 0.8.3
>
>
> In KAFKA-1690, we are adding the SSL support at Selector. However, there are 
> still a few places where we use BlockingChannel for inter-broker 
> communication. We need to replace those usage with Selector/NetworkClient to 
> enable inter-broker communication over SSL. Specially, BlockingChannel is 
> currently used in the following places.
> 1. ControllerChannelManager: for the controller to propagate metadata to the 
> brokers.
> 2. KafkaServer: for the broker to send controlled shutdown request to the 
> controller.
> 3. -AbstractFetcherThread: for the follower to fetch data from the leader 
> (through SimpleConsumer)- moved to KAFKA-2440



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to