-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31369/#review74553
-----------------------------------------------------------


Thanks for the patch, Ashish. Its shaping up to be a very useful example. 
Two comments:

1. I think the ser/de should be part of the example and not in "common", I'm 
not sure integer ser/de is useful enough to be distributed with Kafka (although 
Jun can correct me if I got this wrong).

2. I saw a lot of discussion on the mailing list around using the new producer 
async vs. sync. This example shows the async path. Do we want to add another 
"sync" example where we do something like:
val future = producer.send(new ProducerRecord<Integer, String>(topic,
             messageNo,
             messageStr), new DemoCallBack(startTime, messageNo, messageStr));
// this waits for send to complete
future.get

- Gwen Shapira


On Feb. 27, 2015, 7:08 p.m., Ashish Singh wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/31369/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 27, 2015, 7:08 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kafka.
> 
> 
> Bugs: KAFKA-1982
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1982
> 
> 
> Repository: kafka
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> KAFKA-1982: change kafka.examples.Producer to use the new java producer
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/common/serialization/IntegerDeserializer.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/common/serialization/IntegerSerializer.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   examples/src/main/java/kafka/examples/Consumer.java 
> 13135b954f3078eeb7394822b0db25470b746f03 
>   examples/src/main/java/kafka/examples/Producer.java 
> 96e98933148d07564c1b30ba8e805e2433c2adc8 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31369/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ashish Singh
> 
>

Reply via email to