Hi Mickael, Thanks for the response. I agree that there is no critical reason to push KIP-909 into 4.3. Since I've been dealing with some last-minute issues, I'd rather not rush this. Although they've been addressed, the changes deserve a thorough review to ensure we don't introduce any new regressions. Moving it to 4.4 makes sense.
Best, TengYao Chi On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 4:38 PM Mickael Maison <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Bill, > > Yes, fixes and additional tests are fine to merge till code freeze. > > Thanks, > Mickael > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 5:36 PM Mickael Maison <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi TengYao Chi, > > > > We're already over 1 week after the deadline. > > Apart if there's consensus this is a critical feature to get in 4.3 > > (if so let me know) let's just move KIP-909 to 4.4. > > With our time-based release process, you know roughly when 4.4 will > release. > > > > Thanks, > > Mickael > > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 5:15 PM Bill Bejeck <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Mickael, > > > > > > With KIP-1035 there are few additional unit tests we'd like to add. > > > Additionally, a community member is soaking the branch and discovered a > > > bug, OK to merge those before code freeze? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Bill > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 5:18 AM Mickael Maison < > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Matthias, > > > > > > > > Noted. You can cherry-pick tests and doc updates for that feature > till > > > > code freeze. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Mickael > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 10:14 AM Mickael Maison > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Jose, > > > > > > > > > > Yes, you can cherry pick to 4.3. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Mickael > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 10:10 PM José Armando García Sancio via dev > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Mickael, > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks again for volunteering for the 4.3 release. I just merged > (1) > > > > > > Jonah's implementation for KIP-1219 (2). KAFKA-19541 (3) is > marked for > > > > > > a fix in 4.3.0. Users have experienced controller unavailability > when > > > > > > deployed on low-bandwidth networks. This KIP and its > implementation > > > > > > make the fix configurable. > > > > > > > > > > > > Can I cherry-pick the commit to the 4.3 branch? > > > > > > > > > > > > (1) > > > > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/commit/4d3c65898dff8bf03a1111cb9956c6340e29de81 > > > > > > (2) > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1219%3A+Configurations+for+KRaft+Fetch+and+FetchSnapshot+Byte+Size > > > > > > (3) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-19541 > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > -- > > > > > > -José > > > > >
