Hi All,

It would be nice if we could have more people to review and vote for this
KIP.
Many thanks!

Qichao


On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 2:43 PM Qichao Chu <qic...@uber.com> wrote:

> @Matthias: yeah it should be 977, sorry for the confusion.
> Btw, do you want to cast another binding vote for it?
>
> Best,
> Qichao Chu
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 12:45 AM Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> This is KIP-977, right? Not as the subject says.
>>
>> Guess we won't be able to fix this now. Hope it does not cause confusion
>> down the line...
>>
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>> On 11/16/23 4:43 AM, Kamal Chandraprakash wrote:
>> > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP!
>> >
>> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 9:00 AM Satish Duggana <
>> satish.dugg...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Thanks Qichao for the KIP.
>> >>
>> >> +1 (binding)
>> >>
>> >> ~Satish.
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 at 02:20, Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya
>> >> <quilcate.jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Qichao, thanks again for leading this proposal!
>> >>>
>> >>> +1 (non-binding)
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>> Jorge.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 19:17, Divij Vaidya <divijvaidy...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> +1 (binding)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I was involved in the discussion thread for this KIP and support it
>> in
>> >> its
>> >>>> current form.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> Divij Vaidya
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 10:55 AM Qichao Chu <qic...@uber.com.invalid
>> >
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Hi all,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I'd like to call a vote for KIP-977: Partition-Level Throughput
>> >> Metrics.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Please take a look here:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-977%3A+Partition-Level+Throughput+Metrics
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Best,
>> >>>>> Qichao Chu
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to