This is KIP-977, right? Not as the subject says.
Guess we won't be able to fix this now. Hope it does not cause confusion
down the line...
-Matthias
On 11/16/23 4:43 AM, Kamal Chandraprakash wrote:
+1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP!
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 9:00 AM Satish Duggana <satish.dugg...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Thanks Qichao for the KIP.
+1 (binding)
~Satish.
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 at 02:20, Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya
<quilcate.jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
Qichao, thanks again for leading this proposal!
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers,
Jorge.
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 19:17, Divij Vaidya <divijvaidy...@gmail.com>
wrote:
+1 (binding)
I was involved in the discussion thread for this KIP and support it in
its
current form.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 10:55 AM Qichao Chu <qic...@uber.com.invalid>
wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote for KIP-977: Partition-Level Throughput
Metrics.
Please take a look here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-977%3A+Partition-Level+Throughput+Metrics
Best,
Qichao Chu
