@Matthias: yeah it should be 977, sorry for the confusion. Btw, do you want to cast another binding vote for it?
Best, Qichao Chu On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 12:45 AM Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote: > This is KIP-977, right? Not as the subject says. > > Guess we won't be able to fix this now. Hope it does not cause confusion > down the line... > > > -Matthias > > On 11/16/23 4:43 AM, Kamal Chandraprakash wrote: > > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP! > > > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 9:00 AM Satish Duggana <satish.dugg...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > >> Thanks Qichao for the KIP. > >> > >> +1 (binding) > >> > >> ~Satish. > >> > >> On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 at 02:20, Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya > >> <quilcate.jo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Qichao, thanks again for leading this proposal! > >>> > >>> +1 (non-binding) > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Jorge. > >>> > >>> On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 19:17, Divij Vaidya <divijvaidy...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>> +1 (binding) > >>>> > >>>> I was involved in the discussion thread for this KIP and support it in > >> its > >>>> current form. > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Divij Vaidya > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 10:55 AM Qichao Chu <qic...@uber.com.invalid> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi all, > >>>>> > >>>>> I'd like to call a vote for KIP-977: Partition-Level Throughput > >> Metrics. > >>>>> > >>>>> Please take a look here: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-977%3A+Partition-Level+Throughput+Metrics > >>>>> > >>>>> Best, > >>>>> Qichao Chu > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > > >
