John, I saw the invite be re-sent, and accepted it.
Thanks for following up! Greg On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 3:08 PM John Roesler <vvcep...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hello Greg, Andrew, and Victoria, > > I have just re-added you to the file, so you should receive new invites. > Please let us know if you have any trouble! > > Thanks, > -John > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2023, at 10:31, John Roesler wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I put in a ticket with Apache Infra to re-send these invites, and they > > told me I should just remove the usernames in one commit and then > > re-add them in a subsequent commit to trigger the invites again. > > > > I will go ahead and do this for the users who requested it on this > > thread (Greg and Andrew, as well as for Victoria who asked me about it > > separately). If there is anyone else who needs a re-send, please let us > > know. > > > > I'm sorry for the confusion, Hao. The docs claimed we could add 20 > > users, but when I actually checked in the file, I got an automated > > notification that we could actually only have 10. > > > > As for triggering the build, I don't believe you'll be able to log in > > to Jenkins, but you should be able to say "retest this please" in a PR > > comment to trigger it. Apparently, that doesn't work anymore, though. > > I'll file an Infra ticket for it. > > > > Thanks all, > > John > > > > On Fri, Jun 2, 2023, at 18:46, Hao Li wrote: > >> Hi Luke, > >> > >> Sorry for the late reply. Can you also add me to the whitelist? I believe > >> I'm supposed to be there as well. Matthias and John can vouch for me :) My > >> github ID is "lihaosky". > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Hao > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 4:43 PM Greg Harris <greg.har...@aiven.io.invalid> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Luke, > >>> > >>> I see that the PR has been merged, but I don't believe it re-sent the > >>> invitation. > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> Greg > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 6:46 PM Luke Chen <show...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > Hi Greg and Andrew, > >>> > > >>> > Sorry, I don't know how to re-sent the invitation. > >>> > It looks like it is auto sent after the .asf.yaml updated. > >>> > Since updating collaborator list is part of release process based on the > >>> doc > >>> > <https://kafka.apache.org/contributing>, I just created a new list and > >>> > opened a PR: > >>> > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13790 > >>> > > >>> > Hope that after this PR merged, you'll get a new invitation. > >>> > > >>> > Thanks. > >>> > Luke > >>> > > >>> > On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 5:27 AM Andrew Grant <agr...@confluent.io.invalid > >>> > > >>> > wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > Hi all, > >>> > > Like Greg I also received an invitation to collaborate but was too > >>> slow to > >>> > > accept the invite :( I'm also wondering if there's a way to resend the > >>> > > invite? I'm andymg3 on GitHub. > >>> > > Thanks, > >>> > > Andrew > >>> > > > >>> > > On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 12:12 PM Greg Harris > >>> <greg.har...@aiven.io.invalid > >>> > > > > >>> > > wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > > > Hey all, > >>> > > > > >>> > > > I received an invitation to collaborate on apache/kafka, but let the > >>> > > > invitation expire after 7 days. > >>> > > > Is there a workflow for refreshing the invite, or is an admin able > >>> > > > to > >>> > > > manually re-invite me? > >>> > > > I'm gharris1727 on github. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Thanks! > >>> > > > Greg > >>> > > > > >>> > > > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 9:32 AM Justine Olshan > >>> > > > <jols...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote: > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > Hey Yash, > >>> > > > > I'm not sure how it used to be for sure, but I do remember we used > >>> to > >>> > > > have > >>> > > > > a different build system. I wonder if this used to work with the > >>> old > >>> > > > build > >>> > > > > system and not any more. > >>> > > > > I'd be curious if other projects have something similar and how it > >>> > > works. > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > Thanks, > >>> > > > > Justine > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 9:22 AM Yash Mayya <yash.ma...@gmail.com> > >>> > > wrote: > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > Hi Justine, > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Thanks for the response. Non-committers don't have Apache > >>> accounts; > >>> > > > are you > >>> > > > > > suggesting that there wasn't a need to sign in earlier and a > >>> change > >>> > > in > >>> > > > this > >>> > > > > > policy is restricting collaborators from triggering Jenkins > >>> builds? > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Thanks, > >>> > > > > > Yash > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 9:30 PM Justine Olshan > >>> > > > > > <jols...@confluent.io.invalid> > >>> > > > > > wrote: > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > Yash, > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > When I rebuild, I go to the CloudBees CI page and I have to > >>> log in > >>> > > > with > >>> > > > > > my > >>> > > > > > > apache account. > >>> > > > > > > Not sure if the change in the build system or the need to sign > >>> in > >>> > > is > >>> > > > part > >>> > > > > > > of the problem. > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 4:54 AM Federico Valeri < > >>> > > > fedeval...@gmail.com> > >>> > > > > > > wrote: > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > +1 on Divij suggestions > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 12:04 PM Divij Vaidya < > >>> > > > divijvaidy...@gmail.com > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > wrote: > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Hey folks > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > A week into this experiment, I am finding the ability to > >>> add > >>> > > > labels, > >>> > > > > > > > > request for reviewers and ability to close PRs very > >>> > > > > > > > > useful. > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > 1. May I suggest an improvement to the process by > >>> requesting > >>> > > for > >>> > > > some > >>> > > > > > > > > guidance on the interest areas for various committers. > >>> > > > > > > > > This > >>> > > would > >>> > > > > > help > >>> > > > > > > us > >>> > > > > > > > > request for reviews from the right set of individuals. > >>> > > > > > > > > As a reference, we have tried something similar with > >>> > > > > > > > > Apache > >>> > > > TinkerPop > >>> > > > > > > > (see > >>> > > > > > > > > TinkerPop Contributors section at the end) [1], where the > >>> > > > committers > >>> > > > > > > self > >>> > > > > > > > > identify their preferred area of interest. > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > 2. I would also request creation of the following new > >>> labels: > >>> > > > > > > > > tiered-storage, transactions, security, refactor, > >>> zk-migration, > >>> > > > > > > > > first-contribution (so that we can prioritize reviews for > >>> first > >>> > > > time > >>> > > > > > > > > contributors as an encouragement), build, metrics > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > [1] https://tinkerpop.apache.org/ > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > -- > >>> > > > > > > > > Divij Vaidya > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 11:07 PM John Roesler < > >>> > > > vvcep...@apache.org> > >>> > > > > > > > wrote: > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > Hello again, all, > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > Just a quick update: after merging the changes to > >>> asf.yaml, I > >>> > > > > > > received > >>> > > > > > > > a > >>> > > > > > > > > > notification that the list is limited to only 10 people, > >>> not > >>> > > > 20 as > >>> > > > > > > the > >>> > > > > > > > > > documentation states. > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > Here is the list of folks who will now be able to triage > >>> PRs > >>> > > > and > >>> > > > > > > > trigger > >>> > > > > > > > > > builds: Victoria Xia, Greg Harris, Divij Vaidya, Lucas > >>> > > > Brutschy, > >>> > > > > > Yash > >>> > > > > > > > > > Mayya, Philip Nee, vamossagar12, Christo Lolov, Federico > >>> > > > Valeri, > >>> > > > > > and > >>> > > > > > > > andymg3 > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > Thanks all, > >>> > > > > > > > > > -John > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > On 2023/05/12 15:53:40 John Roesler wrote: > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks again for bringing this up, David! > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > As an update to the community, the PMC has approved a > >>> > > > process to > >>> > > > > > > make > >>> > > > > > > > > > use of this feature. > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Here are the relevant updates: > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > PR to add the policy: > >>> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/510 > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > PR to update the list: > >>> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13713 > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Ticket to automate this process.. Contributions > >>> welcome :) > >>> > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14995 > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > And to make sure it doesn't fall through the cracks in > >>> the > >>> > > > mean > >>> > > > > > > time, > >>> > > > > > > > > > here's the release process step: > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Process#ReleaseProcess-UpdatetheCollaboratorsList > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, the "collaborator" feature only allows > >>> 20 > >>> > > > > > usernames, > >>> > > > > > > > so > >>> > > > > > > > > > we have decided to simply take the top 20 non-committer > >>> > > authors > >>> > > > > > from > >>> > > > > > > > the > >>> > > > > > > > > > past year (according to git shortlog). Congratulations > >>> to our > >>> > > > new > >>> > > > > > > > > > collaborators! > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Victoria Xia, Greg Harris, Divij Vaidya, Lucas > >>> Brutschy, > >>> > > Yash > >>> > > > > > > Mayya, > >>> > > > > > > > > > Philip Nee, vamossagar12, Christo Lolov, Federico > >>> Valeri, and > >>> > > > > > andymg3 > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > >>> > > > > > > > > > > -John > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > On 2023/04/27 18:45:09 David Arthur wrote: > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > Hey folks, > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > I stumbled across this wiki page from the infra team > >>> that > >>> > > > > > > > describes the > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > various features supported in the ".asf.yaml" file: > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Git+-+.asf.yaml+features > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > One section that looked particularly interesting was > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Git+-+.asf.yaml+features#Git.asf.yamlfeatures-AssigningexternalcollaboratorswiththetriageroleonGitHub > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > github: > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > collaborators: > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > - userA > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > - userB > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > This would allow us to define non-committers as > >>> > > > collaborators > >>> > > > > > on > >>> > > > > > > > the > >>> > > > > > > > > > Github > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > project. Concretely, this means they would receive > >>> the > >>> > > > "triage" > >>> > > > > > > > Github > >>> > > > > > > > > > role > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > (defined here > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> https://docs.github.com/en/organizations/managing-user-access-to-your-organizations-repositories/repository-roles-for-an-organization#permissions-for-each-role > >>> > > > > > > > > > ). > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > Practically, this means we could let non-committers > >>> do > >>> > > > things > >>> > > > > > > like > >>> > > > > > > > > > assign > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > labels and reviewers on Pull Requests. > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > I wanted to see what the committer group thought > >>> about > >>> > > this > >>> > > > > > > > feature. I > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > think it could be useful. > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > David > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Thanks, > >> Hao
