Thanks for the KIP, David. With the RPC returning a start and length, should the record in the metadata log do the same thing for consistency and to save the byte per record?
Ron On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 11:06 PM Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > Great, thanks. Instead of calling it "bridge release", can we say 3.0? > > Ismael > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 7:48 PM David Arthur <mum...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks for the feedback, Ismael. Renaming the RPC and using start+len > > instead of start+end sounds fine. > > > > And yes, the controller will allocate the IDs in ZK mode for the bridge > > release. > > > > I'll update the KIP to reflect these points. > > > > Thanks! > > > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 7:30 PM Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > > > > Sorry, one more question: the allocation of ids will be done by the > > > controller even in ZK mode, right? > > > > > > Ismael > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 4:26 PM Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > > > > > > One additional comment: if you return the number of ids instead of the > > > end > > > > range, you can use an int32. > > > > > > > > Ismael > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 4:25 PM Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Thanks for the KIP, David. Any reason not to rename > > > >> AllocateProducerIdBlockRequest to AllocateProducerIdsRequest? > > > >> > > > >> Ismael > > > >> > > > >> On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 3:51 PM David Arthur <mum...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Hello everyone, > > > >>> > > > >>> I'd like to start the discussion for KIP-730 > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-730%3A+Producer+ID+generation+in+KRaft+mode > > > >>> > > > >>> This KIP proposes a new RPC for generating blocks of IDs for > > > >>> transactional > > > >>> and idempotent producers. > > > >>> > > > >>> Cheers, > > > >>> David Arthur > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > David Arthur > >
