Great, thanks. Instead of calling it "bridge release", can we say 3.0?
Ismael On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 7:48 PM David Arthur <mum...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the feedback, Ismael. Renaming the RPC and using start+len > instead of start+end sounds fine. > > And yes, the controller will allocate the IDs in ZK mode for the bridge > release. > > I'll update the KIP to reflect these points. > > Thanks! > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 7:30 PM Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > > Sorry, one more question: the allocation of ids will be done by the > > controller even in ZK mode, right? > > > > Ismael > > > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 4:26 PM Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > > > > One additional comment: if you return the number of ids instead of the > > end > > > range, you can use an int32. > > > > > > Ismael > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 4:25 PM Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > > > > >> Thanks for the KIP, David. Any reason not to rename > > >> AllocateProducerIdBlockRequest to AllocateProducerIdsRequest? > > >> > > >> Ismael > > >> > > >> On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 3:51 PM David Arthur <mum...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hello everyone, > > >>> > > >>> I'd like to start the discussion for KIP-730 > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-730%3A+Producer+ID+generation+in+KRaft+mode > > >>> > > >>> This KIP proposes a new RPC for generating blocks of IDs for > > >>> transactional > > >>> and idempotent producers. > > >>> > > >>> Cheers, > > >>> David Arthur > > >>> > > >> > > > > > -- > David Arthur >
