Went through the changes since the last discussion thread, and it's looking
in good shape. Thanks!.
+ 1 (non-binding)

On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 4:34 PM Tom Bentley <tbent...@redhat.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the KIP Colin, it does a great job of clearly explaining some
> pretty complex changes.
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Tom
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 7:13 PM Boyang Chen <reluctanthero...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Colin for the great work to polish the KIP and reach this final
> > stage. +1 (binding) from me
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 9:11 AM David Arthur <mum...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Colin, thanks for driving this. I just read through the KIP again and I
> > > think it is in good shape. Exciting stuff!
> > >
> > > +1 binding
> > >
> > > -David
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 7:46 AM Ron Dagostino <rndg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for shepherding this KIP through the extended discussion,
> Colin.
> > > I
> > > > think we’ve ended up in a good place.  I’m sure there will be more
> > tweaks
> > > > along the way, but the fundamentals are in place.  +1 (non-binding)
> > from
> > > me.
> > > >
> > > > Ron
> > > >
> > > > > On Dec 11, 2020, at 4:39 PM, Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd like to restart the vote on KIP-631: the quorum-based Kafka
> > > > Controller.  The KIP is here:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/4RV4CQ
> > > > >
> > > > > The original DISCUSS thread is here:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1ed098a88c489780016d963b065e8cb450a9080a4736457cd25f323c%40%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> > > > >
> > > > > There is also a second email DISCUSS thread, which is here:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1ed098a88c489780016d963b065e8cb450a9080a4736457cd25f323c%40%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> > > > >
> > > > > Please take a look and vote if you can.
> > > > >
> > > > > best,
> > > > > Colin
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > David Arthur
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to