Randall, we found another blocker: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10262
Luckily, we have already a PR for it. -Matthias On 7/8/20 3:05 PM, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote: > Hey Randall, > > We just discovered another regression in 2.6: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10249 > > The fix is extremely straightforward -- only about two lines of actual > code -- and low risk. It is a new regression introduced in 2.6 and affects > all Streams apps with any suppression or other in-memory state. > > The PR is already ready here: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8996 > > Best, > Sophie > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 10:59 AM John Roesler <vvcep...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi Randall, >> >> While developing system tests, I've just unearthed a new 2.6 regression: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10247 >> >> I've got a PR in progress. Hoping to finish it up today: >> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8994 >> >> Sorry for the trouble, >> -John >> >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, at 09:29, Randall Hauch wrote: >>> Thanks for raising this, David. I agree it makes sense to include this >> fix >>> in 2.6, so I've adjusted the "Fix Version(s)" field to include '2.6.0'. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Randall >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 8:25 AM David Jacot <dja...@confluent.io> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Randall, >>>> >>>> We have discovered an annoying issue that we introduced in 2.5: >>>> >>>> Describing topics with the command line tool fails if the user does not >>>> have the >>>> privileges to access the ListPartitionReassignments API. I believe that >>>> this is the >>>> case for most non-admin users. >>>> >>>> I propose to include the fix in 2.6. The fix is trivial so low risk. >> What >>>> do you think? >>>> >>>> JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10212 >>>> PR: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8947 >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> David >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 4:39 AM John Roesler <vvcep...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Randall, >>>>> >>>>> I neglected to notify this thread when I merged the fix for >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10185 >>>>> on June 19th. I'm sorry about that oversight. It is marked with >>>>> a fix version of 2.6.0. >>>>> >>>>> On a side node, I have a fix for KAFKA-10173, which I'm merging >>>>> and backporting right now. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for managing the release, >>>>> -John >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020, at 10:23, Randall Hauch wrote: >>>>>> Thanks for the update, folks! >>>>>> >>>>>> Based upon Jira [1], we currently have 4 issues that are considered >>>>>> blockers for the 2.6.0 release and production of RCs: >>>>>> >>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10134 - High CPU >>>> issue >>>>>> during rebalance in Kafka consumer after upgrading to 2.5 >>>> (unassigned) >>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10143 - Can no >> longer >>>>>> change replication throttle with reassignment tool (Jason G) >>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10166 - Excessive >>>>>> TaskCorruptedException seen in testing (Sophie, Bruno) >>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10173 >>>>>> - BufferUnderflowException during Kafka Streams Upgrade (John R) >>>>>> >>>>>> and one critical issue that may be a regression that at this time >> will >>>>> not >>>>>> block production of RCs: >>>>>> >>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10017 - Flaky >> Test >>>>>> EosBetaUpgradeIntegrationTest.shouldUpgradeFromEosAlphaToEosBeta >>>>> (Matthias) >>>>>> >>>>>> and one build/release issue we'd like to fix if possible but will >> not >>>>> block >>>>>> RCs or the release: >>>>>> >>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9381 >>>>>> - kafka-streams-scala: Javadocs + Scaladocs not published on >> maven >>>>> central >>>>>> (me) >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm working with the assignees and reporters of these issues (via >>>>> comments >>>>>> on the issues) to identify an ETA and to track progress. Anyone is >>>>> welcome >>>>>> to chime in on those issues. >>>>>> >>>>>> At this time, no other changes (other than PRs that only >> fix/improve >>>>> tests) >>>>>> should be merged to the `2.6` branch. If you think you've >> identified a >>>>> new >>>>>> blocker issue or believe another existing issue should be treated >> as a >>>>>> blocker for 2.6.0, please mark the issue's `fix version` as `2.6.0` >>>> _and_ >>>>>> respond to this thread with details, and I will work with you to >>>>> determine >>>>>> whether it is indeed a blocker. >>>>>> >>>>>> As always, let me know here if you have any questions/concerns. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Randall >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/KAFKA/versions/12346918 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 8:27 AM Mario Molina <mmoli...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Randal, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9018 is not a >>>>> blocker >>>>>>> so >>>>>>> it can be moved to the 2.7.0 version. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Mario >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 20:22, Boyang Chen < >>>> reluctanthero...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hey Randal, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There was another spotted blocker: >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10173 >>>>>>>> As of current, John is working on a fix. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Boyang >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 4:08 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman < >>>>> sop...@confluent.io >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hey all, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Just a heads up that we discovered a new blocker. The fix is >>>> pretty >>>>>>>>> straightforward >>>>>>>>> and there's already a PR for it so it should be resolved >> quickly. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Here's the ticket: >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10198 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 12:52 PM Randall Hauch < >> rha...@gmail.com >>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, Kowshik, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the update on KIP-584. This is listed on the >>>>> "Postponed" >>>>>>>>> section >>>>>>>>>> of the AK 2.6.0 release plan ( >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 >>>>>>>>>> ). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Randall >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:51 PM Kowshik Prakasam < >>>>>>>> kpraka...@confluent.io >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Randall, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We have to remove KIP-584 from the release plan, as this >> item >>>>> will >>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>> completed for 2.6 release (although KIP is accepted). We >> plan >>>>> to >>>>>>>>> include >>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>> in a next release. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>> Kowshik >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:43 AM Maulin Vasavada < >>>>>>>>>>> maulin.vasav...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Randall Hauch >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Can we add KIP-519 to 2.6? It was merged to Trunk >> already >>>> in >>>>>>> April >>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=128650952 >>>>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>> Maulin >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:01 AM Randall Hauch < >>>>> rha...@gmail.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's an update on the AK 2.6.0 release. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Code freeze was Wednesday, and the release plan [1] >> has >>>>> been >>>>>>>>> updated >>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>> reflect all of the KIPs that made the release. We've >> also >>>>> cut >>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> `2.6` >>>>>>>>>>>>> branch that we'll use for the release; see separate >> email >>>>>>>>> announcing >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> new branch. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The next important date for the 2.6.0 release is CODE >>>>> FREEZE on >>>>>>>>> JUNE >>>>>>>>>>> 10, >>>>>>>>>>>>> and until that date all bug fixes are still welcome >> on >>>> the >>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>>>> branch. >>>>>>>>>>>>> But after that, only blocker bugs can be merged to >> the >>>>> release >>>>>>>>>> branch. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> If you have any questions or concerns, please >> contact me >>>> or >>>>>>>> (better >>>>>>>>>>> yet) >>>>>>>>>>>>> reply to this thread. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, and best regards! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Randall >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] AK 2.6.0 Release Plan: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:53 PM Matthias J. Sax < >>>>>>>> mj...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Randall! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added missing KIP-594. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For the postponed KIP section: I removed KIP-441 >> and >>>>> KIP-444 >>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>> both >>>>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>>>>>> completed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Matthias >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/27/20 2:31 PM, Randall Hauch wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey everyone, just a quick update on the 2.6.0 >>>> release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Based on the release plan ( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ), >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> today (May 27) is feature freeze. Any major >> feature >>>>> work >>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already complete will need to push out to the >> next >>>>> release >>>>>>>>>> (either >>>>>>>>>>>> 2.7 >>>>>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3.0). There are a few PRs for KIPs that are >> nearing >>>>>>>> completion, >>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>> we're >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> having some Jenkins build issues. I will send >> another >>>>> email >>>>>>>>> later >>>>>>>>>>>> today >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early tomorrow with an update, and I plan to cut >> the >>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>> branch >>>>>>>>>>>>>> shortly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thereafter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have also updated the list of planned KIPs on >> the >>>>> release >>>>>>>>> plan >>>>>>>>>>>> page ( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ), >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and I've moved to the "Postponed" table any KIP >> that >>>>> looks >>>>>>>> like >>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going to be complete today. If any KIP is in the >>>> wrong >>>>>>> table, >>>>>>>>>>> please >>>>>>>>>>>>> let >>>>>>>>>>>>>> me >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you have any questions or concerns, please >> feel >>>>> free to >>>>>>>>> reply >>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, and best regards! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Randall >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:16 PM Sophie >> Blee-Goldman < >>>>>>>>>>>>> sop...@confluent.io >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Randall, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you also add KIP-613 which was accepted >>>> yesterday? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sophie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:47 AM Randall Hauch < >>>>>>>>> rha...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Tom. I saw last night that the KIP had >> enough >>>>> votes >>>>>>>>> before >>>>>>>>>>>>> today’s >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deadline and I will add it to the roadmap >> today. >>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>> driving >>>>>>>>>>>>>> this! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:18 AM Tom Bentley < >>>>>>>>>> tbent...@redhat.com >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Randall, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we add KIP-585? (I'm not quite sure of the >>>>> protocol >>>>>>>>> here, >>>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thought >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it better to ask than to just add it myself). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 6:54 PM Randall Hauch < >>>>>>>>>> rha...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Greetings! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to volunteer to be release manager >> for >>>> the >>>>>>> next >>>>>>>>>>>> time-based >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release which will be 2.6.0. I've published a >>>>> release >>>>>>>> plan >>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> , >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and have included all of the KIPs that are >>>>> currently >>>>>>>>> approved >>>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actively >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in discussion (though I'm happy to adjust as >>>>>>> necessary). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To stay on our time-based cadence, the KIP >> freeze >>>>> is on >>>>>>>> May >>>>>>>>>> 20 >>>>>>>>>>>>> with a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> target release date of June 24. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me know if there are any objections. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Randall Hauch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
