Hi Randall, I neglected to notify this thread when I merged the fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10185 on June 19th. I'm sorry about that oversight. It is marked with a fix version of 2.6.0.
On a side node, I have a fix for KAFKA-10173, which I'm merging and backporting right now. Thanks for managing the release, -John On Thu, Jun 25, 2020, at 10:23, Randall Hauch wrote: > Thanks for the update, folks! > > Based upon Jira [1], we currently have 4 issues that are considered > blockers for the 2.6.0 release and production of RCs: > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10134 - High CPU issue > during rebalance in Kafka consumer after upgrading to 2.5 (unassigned) > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10143 - Can no longer > change replication throttle with reassignment tool (Jason G) > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10166 - Excessive > TaskCorruptedException seen in testing (Sophie, Bruno) > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10173 > - BufferUnderflowException during Kafka Streams Upgrade (John R) > > and one critical issue that may be a regression that at this time will not > block production of RCs: > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10017 - Flaky Test > EosBetaUpgradeIntegrationTest.shouldUpgradeFromEosAlphaToEosBeta (Matthias) > > and one build/release issue we'd like to fix if possible but will not block > RCs or the release: > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9381 > - kafka-streams-scala: Javadocs + Scaladocs not published on maven central > (me) > > I'm working with the assignees and reporters of these issues (via comments > on the issues) to identify an ETA and to track progress. Anyone is welcome > to chime in on those issues. > > At this time, no other changes (other than PRs that only fix/improve tests) > should be merged to the `2.6` branch. If you think you've identified a new > blocker issue or believe another existing issue should be treated as a > blocker for 2.6.0, please mark the issue's `fix version` as `2.6.0` _and_ > respond to this thread with details, and I will work with you to determine > whether it is indeed a blocker. > > As always, let me know here if you have any questions/concerns. > > Best regards, > > Randall > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/KAFKA/versions/12346918 > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 8:27 AM Mario Molina <mmoli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Randal, > > > > Ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9018 is not a blocker > > so > > it can be moved to the 2.7.0 version. > > > > Mario > > > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 20:22, Boyang Chen <reluctanthero...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hey Randal, > > > > > > There was another spotted blocker: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10173 > > > As of current, John is working on a fix. > > > > > > Boyang > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 4:08 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <sop...@confluent.io > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > > > Just a heads up that we discovered a new blocker. The fix is pretty > > > > straightforward > > > > and there's already a PR for it so it should be resolved quickly. > > > > > > > > Here's the ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10198 > > > > > > > > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 12:52 PM Randall Hauch <rha...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, Kowshik, > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the update on KIP-584. This is listed on the "Postponed" > > > > section > > > > > of the AK 2.6.0 release plan ( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > > ). > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > Randall > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:51 PM Kowshik Prakasam < > > > kpraka...@confluent.io > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Randall, > > > > > > > > > > > > We have to remove KIP-584 from the release plan, as this item will > > > not > > > > be > > > > > > completed for 2.6 release (although KIP is accepted). We plan to > > > > include > > > > > it > > > > > > in a next release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Kowshik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:43 AM Maulin Vasavada < > > > > > > maulin.vasav...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Randall Hauch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we add KIP-519 to 2.6? It was merged to Trunk already in > > April > > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=128650952 > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > Maulin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:01 AM Randall Hauch <rha...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's an update on the AK 2.6.0 release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Code freeze was Wednesday, and the release plan [1] has been > > > > updated > > > > > to > > > > > > > > reflect all of the KIPs that made the release. We've also cut > > the > > > > > `2.6` > > > > > > > > branch that we'll use for the release; see separate email > > > > announcing > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > new branch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The next important date for the 2.6.0 release is CODE FREEZE on > > > > JUNE > > > > > > 10, > > > > > > > > and until that date all bug fixes are still welcome on the > > > release > > > > > > > branch. > > > > > > > > But after that, only blocker bugs can be merged to the release > > > > > branch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me or > > > (better > > > > > > yet) > > > > > > > > reply to this thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, and best regards! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Randall > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] AK 2.6.0 Release Plan: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:53 PM Matthias J. Sax < > > > mj...@apache.org> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Randall! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I added missing KIP-594. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For the postponed KIP section: I removed KIP-441 and KIP-444 > > as > > > > > both > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > completed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/27/20 2:31 PM, Randall Hauch wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hey everyone, just a quick update on the 2.6.0 release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Based on the release plan ( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > > > > > > ), > > > > > > > > > > today (May 27) is feature freeze. Any major feature work > > that > > > > is > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > already complete will need to push out to the next release > > > > > (either > > > > > > > 2.7 > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > > 3.0). There are a few PRs for KIPs that are nearing > > > completion, > > > > > and > > > > > > > > we're > > > > > > > > > > having some Jenkins build issues. I will send another email > > > > later > > > > > > > today > > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > > early tomorrow with an update, and I plan to cut the > > release > > > > > branch > > > > > > > > > shortly > > > > > > > > > > thereafter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have also updated the list of planned KIPs on the release > > > > plan > > > > > > > page ( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > > > > > > ), > > > > > > > > > > and I've moved to the "Postponed" table any KIP that looks > > > like > > > > > it > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > going to be complete today. If any KIP is in the wrong > > table, > > > > > > please > > > > > > > > let > > > > > > > > > me > > > > > > > > > > know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to > > > > reply > > > > > to > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, and best regards! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Randall > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:16 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman < > > > > > > > > sop...@confluent.io > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hey Randall, > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Can you also add KIP-613 which was accepted yesterday? > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks! > > > > > > > > > >> Sophie > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:47 AM Randall Hauch < > > > > rha...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Hi, Tom. I saw last night that the KIP had enough votes > > > > before > > > > > > > > today’s > > > > > > > > > >>> deadline and I will add it to the roadmap today. Thanks > > for > > > > > > driving > > > > > > > > > this! > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:18 AM Tom Bentley < > > > > > tbent...@redhat.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Hi Randall, > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Can we add KIP-585? (I'm not quite sure of the protocol > > > > here, > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > >> thought > > > > > > > > > >>>> it better to ask than to just add it myself). > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks, > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Tom > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 6:54 PM Randall Hauch < > > > > > rha...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Greetings! > > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> I'd like to volunteer to be release manager for the > > next > > > > > > > time-based > > > > > > > > > >>>> feature > > > > > > > > > >>>>> release which will be 2.6.0. I've published a release > > > plan > > > > at > > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > > > > > > >>>>> , > > > > > > > > > >>>>> and have included all of the KIPs that are currently > > > > approved > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > >>> actively > > > > > > > > > >>>>> in discussion (though I'm happy to adjust as > > necessary). > > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> To stay on our time-based cadence, the KIP freeze is on > > > May > > > > > 20 > > > > > > > > with a > > > > > > > > > >>>>> target release date of June 24. > > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Let me know if there are any objections. > > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Thanks, > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Randall Hauch > > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
