> On April 1, 2014, 8:21 p.m., Jay Kreps wrote:
> > clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/common/network/Selector.java, line 
> > 432
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/19879/diff/1/?file=544095#file544095line432>
> >
> >     Here was my convention:
> >     1. All rates are in seconds (the default)
> >     2. All latencies are in ms unless otherwise noted.
> >     3. A few things require finer grained measurement than 1 ms and for 
> > these I called it out in the name so this would not be confusing.
> 
> Timothy Chen wrote:
>     Then perhaps io-ratio needs to add a ns in it as it's in nanoseconds 
> right?

No actually that one is a ratio since it is a rate per nanosecond. So a value 
of 0.8 would indicate that we spent 80% of our time doing I/O.


- Jay


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19879/#review39196
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 1, 2014, 7:49 p.m., Jay Kreps wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/19879/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 1, 2014, 7:49 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kafka.
> 
> 
> Bugs: KAFKA-1251
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1251
> 
> 
> Repository: kafka
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> KAFKA-1251 Further metric naming standardization.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/producer/KafkaProducer.java 
> 8c1c5751a9186e6bc3196d152e4c3e948cc34b39 
>   
> clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/producer/internals/Sender.java 
> c92bfbcd02b5444d2673b00f9699a553a40a877a 
>   clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/common/network/Selector.java 
> 5b801e47faab3d365b771396fb6e9f7f66600109 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19879/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jay Kreps
> 
>

Reply via email to