Juan Pablo,
first, thanks for all your efforts, I too appreciate !
I have been testing the trunk, the only thing I could find until now is
every 30 seconds a couple of these in the jspwiki.log:
2013-12-18 20:44:11,954 ERROR org.apache.wiki.WatchDog - Stack is empty!
java.util.EmptyStackException
at java.util.Stack.peek(Stack.java:102)
at org.apache.wiki.WatchDog.check(WatchDog.java:264)
at org.apache.wiki.WatchDog.access$300(WatchDog.java:52)
at
org.apache.wiki.WatchDog$WatchDogThread.backgroundTask(WatchDog.java:371)
at
org.apache.wiki.WikiBackgroundThread.run(WikiBackgroundThread.java:118)
I'm investigating it currently...
kind regards,
Harry
On 18 December 2013 02:00, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <
juanpablo.san...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> quick note, as it's nearly 2.00am here; done almost all steps required to
> publish all artifacts on a staging repo, which the vote is going to be run
> against. Currently blocked by a nexus timeout on closing the staging repo,
> progress can be followed at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7105.
> Once this is fixed (hopefully by tomorrow..), the vote for 2.10.0 release
> will be called.
>
>
> br,
> juan pablo
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:50 PM, Siegfried Goeschl <
> siegfried.goes...@it20one.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Juan Pablo,
> >
> > I will play around with the current trunk :-)
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Siegfried Goeschl
> >
> >
> > On 16 Dec 2013, at 22:03, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <
> > juanpablo.san...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > just finished doing a big bunch of pending refactors prior to releasing
> > > 2.10. We should be able to end up with all the artifacts on maven
> central
> > > too (once the vote+release passes), and use a staged repository[#1] to
> > vote
> > > instead of uploading to somewhere at people.a.o
> > >
> > > There are only a couple of points remaining: updating UPGRADING and
> > > ReleaseNotes and ensuring all the prerequisites of [#1] are met.
> > Hopefully,
> > > they will be done between today and tomorrow. In the meantime, this is
> a
> > > call for testing current trunk, which is going to be most likely
> 2.10.0.
> > > I've tried to test all the recent commits (and will continue to do some
> > > more testing), but for sure the more people looking into it before
> voting
> > > the release, the better.
> > >
> > >
> > > thanks + br,
> > > juan pablo
> > >
> > >
> > > [#1]:
> > >
> http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html#staging-maven
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Siegfried Goeschl <
> > > siegfried.goes...@it20one.at> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi folks,
> > >>
> > >> IMHO it is important to get the release out
> > >>
> > >> * users are looking at project activity - there are many different
> wikis
> > >> out there ...
> > >>
> > >> * are there bugfixes in 2.9.1 the users would appreciate? Better have
> a
> > >> small bugfix release now than the latest and greatest release 9 months
> > down
> > >> the road (which might get delayed later on)
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >>
> > >> Siegfried Goeschl
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 10.11.13 21:39, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> about 2.9 vs 2.10, I was having in mind releasing trunk in any case,
> > the
> > >>> version numbers were just to note binary compatibility. If we release
> > >>> current trunk as it is, it isn't binary compatible with latest
> release,
> > >>> because of 2.10.0-svn-8 and 2.10.0-svn-26. We could copy those
> classes
> > >>> back
> > >>> to their original location and have 2.9.2 (with some duplicated
> > classes)
> > >>> or
> > >>> just release 2.10.0 as it is. I'm a little inclined to 2.9.2,
> because I
> > >>> was
> > >>> having in mind further similar refactorings with the rest of the
> > managers
> > >>> for 2.10, but given the fact I've been unable to spend time coding
> > these
> > >>> last months, 2.10 would also be fine for me.
> > >>>
> > >>> As an aside, there's an initial Infra setup [#1] to allow us to
> deploy
> > to
> > >>> repository.apache.org, which is synced with central. Once that is
> > done,
> > >>> I'll update the appropiate page on jspwiki.a.o
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> br,
> > >>> juan pablo
> > >>>
> > >>> [#1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6986
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Glen Mazza <glen.ma...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Yes, I don't see any need to release the same 2.9.1 product just
> > without
> > >>>> "incubator" in its version name, that's not a very Apache-esque way
> of
> > >>>> doing things (the "incubator" in version release is not an indicator
> > of
> > >>>> software quality, as Apache stresses over and over.) If none of us
> > >>>> right
> > >>>> now have time to work on JSPWiki (a situation I hope changes soon
> with
> > >>>> me),
> > >>>> busywork such as that isn't going to help the situation.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Glen
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 11/08/2013 01:02 PM, Harry Metske wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> what would be reasons to release 2.9.x versus 2.10.x ?
> > >>>>> The latter has more issues fixed...
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> regards,
> > >>>>> Harry
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On 8 November 2013 08:41, Jürgen Weber <juer...@jwi.de> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> +1
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Am 07.11.2013 19:33 schrieb "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" <
> > >>>>>> juanpablo.san...@gmail.com>:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +1 too
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> In order to remain 2.9.x, we should get back o.a.w.WikiException
> > >>>>>>> (deleted
> > >>>>>>> in favour of o.a.w.api.WikiException) and maybe one or two
> similar
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> changes,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> have to check svn to be sure.. Otherwise we should release 2.10.0
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I'm thinking we could also use this release to publish the
> release
> > on
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> ASF's
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> maven repo, so we also end up on central. WDYT?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> br,
> > >>>>>>> juan pablo
> > >>>>>>> El 05/11/2013 17:07, "Harry Metske" <harry.met...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>> escribió:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> +1
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On 5 November 2013 16:50, Jürgen Weber <juer...@jwi.de> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Currently the dev mailing list is a bit lonely, there seems
> not a
> > >>>>>>>> lot
> > >>>>>>>> be
> > >>>>>>>> going on.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I suggest that JSPWiki 2.9.1 come out from incubator.
> > >>>>>>>>> Actually 2.9.1 looks good. Why not release it?
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Release_early,_release_often
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> > >>>>>>>>> Juergen
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
