No, not if we have nothing significant to add. Volunteers can't afford
to be engaging in busywork. And, yes, projects are allowed to go on
snooze between releases.
Glen
On 11/08/2013 03:08 PM, Jürgen Weber wrote:
no difference, but it should be soon. Last incubating is from May, so it
looks like not a lot happens. An project should be alive and kicking and
release often.
Juergen
2013/11/8 Harry Metske <harry.met...@gmail.com>
what would be reasons to release 2.9.x versus 2.10.x ?
The latter has more issues fixed...
regards,
Harry
On 8 November 2013 08:41, Jürgen Weber <juer...@jwi.de> wrote:
+1
Am 07.11.2013 19:33 schrieb "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" <
juanpablo.san...@gmail.com>:
+1 too
In order to remain 2.9.x, we should get back o.a.w.WikiException
(deleted
in favour of o.a.w.api.WikiException) and maybe one or two similar
changes,
have to check svn to be sure.. Otherwise we should release 2.10.0
I'm thinking we could also use this release to publish the release on
ASF's
maven repo, so we also end up on central. WDYT?
br,
juan pablo
El 05/11/2013 17:07, "Harry Metske" <harry.met...@gmail.com> escribió:
+1
On 5 November 2013 16:50, Jürgen Weber <juer...@jwi.de> wrote:
Currently the dev mailing list is a bit lonely, there seems not a
lot
be
going on.
I suggest that JSPWiki 2.9.1 come out from incubator.
Actually 2.9.1 looks good. Why not release it?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Release_early,_release_often
Cheers,
Juergen
