Hi, just finished doing a big bunch of pending refactors prior to releasing 2.10. We should be able to end up with all the artifacts on maven central too (once the vote+release passes), and use a staged repository[#1] to vote instead of uploading to somewhere at people.a.o
There are only a couple of points remaining: updating UPGRADING and ReleaseNotes and ensuring all the prerequisites of [#1] are met. Hopefully, they will be done between today and tomorrow. In the meantime, this is a call for testing current trunk, which is going to be most likely 2.10.0. I've tried to test all the recent commits (and will continue to do some more testing), but for sure the more people looking into it before voting the release, the better. thanks + br, juan pablo [#1]: http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html#staging-maven On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Siegfried Goeschl < siegfried.goes...@it20one.at> wrote: > Hi folks, > > IMHO it is important to get the release out > > * users are looking at project activity - there are many different wikis > out there ... > > * are there bugfixes in 2.9.1 the users would appreciate? Better have a > small bugfix release now than the latest and greatest release 9 months down > the road (which might get delayed later on) > > Cheers, > > Siegfried Goeschl > > > > > On 10.11.13 21:39, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> about 2.9 vs 2.10, I was having in mind releasing trunk in any case, the >> version numbers were just to note binary compatibility. If we release >> current trunk as it is, it isn't binary compatible with latest release, >> because of 2.10.0-svn-8 and 2.10.0-svn-26. We could copy those classes >> back >> to their original location and have 2.9.2 (with some duplicated classes) >> or >> just release 2.10.0 as it is. I'm a little inclined to 2.9.2, because I >> was >> having in mind further similar refactorings with the rest of the managers >> for 2.10, but given the fact I've been unable to spend time coding these >> last months, 2.10 would also be fine for me. >> >> As an aside, there's an initial Infra setup [#1] to allow us to deploy to >> repository.apache.org, which is synced with central. Once that is done, >> I'll update the appropiate page on jspwiki.a.o >> >> >> br, >> juan pablo >> >> [#1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6986 >> >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Glen Mazza <glen.ma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Yes, I don't see any need to release the same 2.9.1 product just without >>> "incubator" in its version name, that's not a very Apache-esque way of >>> doing things (the "incubator" in version release is not an indicator of >>> software quality, as Apache stresses over and over.) If none of us >>> right >>> now have time to work on JSPWiki (a situation I hope changes soon with >>> me), >>> busywork such as that isn't going to help the situation. >>> >>> Glen >>> >>> >>> On 11/08/2013 01:02 PM, Harry Metske wrote: >>> >>> what would be reasons to release 2.9.x versus 2.10.x ? >>>> The latter has more issues fixed... >>>> >>>> regards, >>>> Harry >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 8 November 2013 08:41, Jürgen Weber <juer...@jwi.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>>> Am 07.11.2013 19:33 schrieb "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" < >>>>> juanpablo.san...@gmail.com>: >>>>> >>>>> +1 too >>>>> >>>>>> In order to remain 2.9.x, we should get back o.a.w.WikiException >>>>>> (deleted >>>>>> in favour of o.a.w.api.WikiException) and maybe one or two similar >>>>>> >>>>>> changes, >>>>> >>>>> have to check svn to be sure.. Otherwise we should release 2.10.0 >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm thinking we could also use this release to publish the release on >>>>>> >>>>>> ASF's >>>>> >>>>> maven repo, so we also end up on central. WDYT? >>>>>> >>>>>> br, >>>>>> juan pablo >>>>>> El 05/11/2013 17:07, "Harry Metske" <harry.met...@gmail.com> >>>>>> escribió: >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5 November 2013 16:50, Jürgen Weber <juer...@jwi.de> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Currently the dev mailing list is a bit lonely, there seems not a >>>>>>> lot >>>>>>> be >>>>>>> going on. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I suggest that JSPWiki 2.9.1 come out from incubator. >>>>>>>> Actually 2.9.1 looks good. Why not release it? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Release_early,_release_often >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> Juergen >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >
