Hi Fedor, Thanks again - you're really helping to improve the quality of the release.
I've fixed everything except for the progress bar issue - should not be a blocker though, I will move it outside of the alpha if I do not succeed by the end of tomorrow. Can you please verify that other issues are fixed (especially IGNITE-13936)? Here is the new staging: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheignite-1500/ -Val On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 5:31 AM Fedor Malchikov <fmalchi...@gridgain.com> wrote: > Hi Valentin, > I looked at the resources available on staging and found a number of > additional issues: > One blocker: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13936 > and three minor: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13938 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13937 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13939 > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 10:24 PM Valentin Kulichenko < > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I've also noticed that there is functionality allowing to use custom > Maven > > repositories. However, it is available only for the 'module add' command, > > but not for the 'init' command. Created a ticket for this as well: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13923 > > > > -Val > > > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 11:21 AM Valentin Kulichenko < > > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Fedor, > > > > > > Thanks for doing this! > > > > > > Regarding IGNITE-13921: in the first version, the tool created the > > folders > > > in the current directory, which created unpredictable behavior, so we > > > switched to home as default. However, using the folder where the tool > is > > > located instead of the home folder seems fair - I've included the > ticket > > > into the alpha1. Also, note that in the next versions, there will be an > > > option to customize the paths, so the user will not have to rely on > > default > > > values. > > > > > > If you don't mind, I suggest to postpone other issues for further > > > development - they do not look so critical. > > > > > > -Val > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 9:45 AM Fedor Malchikov < > fmalchi...@gridgain.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hello everyone, > > >> I smoke tested the alpha version of the CLI tool on ubuntu and > windows. > > So > > >> I found the following issues: > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13914 > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13924 > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13921 > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13922 > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13920 > > >> > > >> > > >> On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 2:18 AM Valentin Kulichenko < > > >> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Folks, > > >> > > > >> > I've created a version in Jira and a Wiki page for the alpha > release: > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+3.0.0-alpha1 > > >> > > > >> > Based on the scope described earlier, all code changes are > completed - > > >> only > > >> > documentation is left. Code freeze starts now - only bug fixes are > > >> > permitted. > > >> > > > >> > I'm planning to start the vote next week, presumably on Tuesday. > > >> > > > >> > -Val > > >> > > > >> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 9:56 AM Valentin Kulichenko < > > >> > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > Ivan, > > >> > > > > >> > > Yes, you are correct - no tables, caches, compute or any other > major > > >> > > features will be available. > > >> > > > > >> > > Alpha releases are generally produced in the middle of the > > development > > >> > > process for internal testing. In my view, that's exactly what the > > >> > upcoming > > >> > > release is, but let me know if you have a better naming in mind. > > >> > > > > >> > > -Val > > >> > > > > >> > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 1:56 AM Ivan Pavlukhin < > vololo...@gmail.com > > > > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > >> Hi, > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Is it right that suggested Alpha will not be able to perform any > > >> > >> operations with data (tables, caches)? In that case Alpha naming > > >> > >> confuses me. Actually do not know how such kind of demo releases > > >> > >> should be attributed. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> 2020-12-21 20:42 GMT+03:00, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > > >> > >> > Certainly, the end of Jan is more realistic and reasonable. > Let's > > >> talk > > >> > >> this > > >> > >> > out offline and then put a session on the virtual meetup's > > >> schedule. > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > - > > >> > >> > Denis > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 4:35 PM Valentin Kulichenko < > > >> > >> > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> >> Hi Denis, > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> Sure, that's a great idea! I'm thinking, however, that it > makes > > >> sense > > >> > >> to > > >> > >> >> take a pause after the release and let people try it out on > > their > > >> own > > >> > >> so > > >> > >> >> that the experience is as close to real-life as possible. How > > >> about > > >> > >> >> closer > > >> > >> >> to the end of January? > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> -Val > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 8:53 PM Denis Magda < > dma...@apache.org> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > Hi Val, > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > That's the pace, I'll be happy to play with the alpha and > > share > > >> > >> >> > feedback. > > >> > >> >> > Also, what if we arrange a community gathering after the > > >> holidays > > >> > to > > >> > >> >> > demonstrate what alpha does and get more details from the > > >> involved > > >> > >> >> > contributors on what's coming next? > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > As for the release process, yes, that needs to be a formal > > vote > > >> as > > >> > >> long > > >> > >> >> as > > >> > >> >> > you're publishing artifacts to Maven and updating the > website > > >> with > > >> > >> >> > references to the binaries and documentation pages. > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > - > > >> > >> >> > Denis > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 6:13 PM Valentin Kulichenko < > > >> > >> >> > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > Igniters, > > >> > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > The repository for Ignite 3.x [1] was created less than a > > >> month > > >> > >> ago, > > >> > >> >> and > > >> > >> >> > we > > >> > >> >> > > already have several merged pull requests. Many thanks to > > >> > everyone > > >> > >> >> > involved > > >> > >> >> > > for the contributions! > > >> > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > Currently, we have the following functionality available > in > > >> the > > >> > >> main > > >> > >> >> > > branch: > > >> > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > - New configuration framework which is compatible with > > the > > >> > HOCON > > >> > >> >> > format. > > >> > >> >> > > - The “ignite-runner” module, which currently > > incorporates > > >> the > > >> > >> >> > > aforementioned configuration framework and REST > endpoints > > >> to > > >> > >> >> interact > > >> > >> >> > > with > > >> > >> >> > > the framework. > > >> > >> >> > > - The first version of the unified CLI tool. > > >> > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > This set of features does not include any actual Ignite > > APIs. > > >> > >> >> > > However, > > >> > >> >> it > > >> > >> >> > > clearly demonstrates the basic mechanics of how the > product > > >> will > > >> > be > > >> > >> >> > > installed and upgraded, how the user will interact with > it, > > >> etc. > > >> > I > > >> > >> >> would > > >> > >> >> > > like to use this to gather feedback from the community in > > the > > >> > early > > >> > >> >> > stages. > > >> > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > To make sure the experience is as close to real life as > > >> > possible, I > > >> > >> >> want > > >> > >> >> > to > > >> > >> >> > > deliver what we have as an alpha release, meaning that all > > the > > >> > >> >> > > required > > >> > >> >> > > binaries will be deployed on the website and in Maven. > There > > >> will > > >> > >> >> > > also > > >> > >> >> be > > >> > >> >> > > some basic documentation describing how to install and use > > the > > >> > >> >> > > product. > > >> > >> >> > > This way, anyone will be able to download the product and > > try > > >> it > > >> > >> out. > > >> > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > My main question here -- do we need a formal vote for > such a > > >> > build? > > >> > >> >> > > Or > > >> > >> >> it > > >> > >> >> > > can be treated as a release candidate? > > >> > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > Any other thoughts? > > >> > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite-3 > > >> > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > -Val > > >> > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> -- > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Best regards, > > >> > >> Ivan Pavlukhin > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >