Hi Fedor,

Thanks again - you're really helping to improve the quality of the release.

I've fixed everything except for the progress bar issue - should not be a
blocker though, I will move it outside of the alpha if I do not succeed by
the end of tomorrow.

Can you please verify that other issues are fixed (especially
IGNITE-13936)? Here is the new staging:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheignite-1500/

-Val

On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 5:31 AM Fedor Malchikov <fmalchi...@gridgain.com>
wrote:

> Hi Valentin,
> I looked at the resources available on staging and found a number of
> additional issues:
> One blocker:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13936
> and three minor:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13938
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13937
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13939
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 10:24 PM Valentin Kulichenko <
> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I've also noticed that there is functionality allowing to use custom
> Maven
> > repositories. However, it is available only for the 'module add' command,
> > but not for the 'init' command. Created a ticket for this as well:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13923
> >
> > -Val
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 11:21 AM Valentin Kulichenko <
> > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Fedor,
> > >
> > > Thanks for doing this!
> > >
> > > Regarding IGNITE-13921: in the first version, the tool created the
> > folders
> > > in the current directory, which created unpredictable behavior, so we
> > > switched to home as default. However, using the folder where the tool
> is
> > > located instead of the home folder seems fair - I've included the
> ticket
> > > into the alpha1. Also, note that in the next versions, there will be an
> > > option to customize the paths, so the user will not have to rely on
> > default
> > > values.
> > >
> > > If you don't mind, I suggest to postpone other issues for further
> > > development - they do not look so critical.
> > >
> > > -Val
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 9:45 AM Fedor Malchikov <
> fmalchi...@gridgain.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello everyone,
> > >> I smoke tested the alpha version of the CLI tool on ubuntu and
> windows.
> > So
> > >> I found the following issues:
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13914
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13924
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13921
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13922
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13920
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 2:18 AM Valentin Kulichenko <
> > >> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Folks,
> > >> >
> > >> > I've created a version in Jira and a Wiki page for the alpha
> release:
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+3.0.0-alpha1
> > >> >
> > >> > Based on the scope described earlier, all code changes are
> completed -
> > >> only
> > >> > documentation is left. Code freeze starts now - only bug fixes are
> > >> > permitted.
> > >> >
> > >> > I'm planning to start the vote next week, presumably on Tuesday.
> > >> >
> > >> > -Val
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 9:56 AM Valentin Kulichenko <
> > >> > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Ivan,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Yes, you are correct - no tables, caches, compute or any other
> major
> > >> > > features will be available.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Alpha releases are generally produced in the middle of the
> > development
> > >> > > process for internal testing. In my view, that's exactly what the
> > >> > upcoming
> > >> > > release is, but let me know if you have a better naming in mind.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > -Val
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 1:56 AM Ivan Pavlukhin <
> vololo...@gmail.com
> > >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> Hi,
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Is it right that suggested Alpha will not be able to perform any
> > >> > >> operations with data (tables, caches)? In that case Alpha naming
> > >> > >> confuses me. Actually do not know how such kind of demo releases
> > >> > >> should be attributed.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> 2020-12-21 20:42 GMT+03:00, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>:
> > >> > >> > Certainly, the end of Jan is more realistic and reasonable.
> Let's
> > >> talk
> > >> > >> this
> > >> > >> > out offline and then put a session on the virtual meetup's
> > >> schedule.
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > -
> > >> > >> > Denis
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 4:35 PM Valentin Kulichenko <
> > >> > >> > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >> Hi Denis,
> > >> > >> >>
> > >> > >> >> Sure, that's a great idea! I'm thinking, however, that it
> makes
> > >> sense
> > >> > >> to
> > >> > >> >> take a pause after the release and let people try it out on
> > their
> > >> own
> > >> > >> so
> > >> > >> >> that the experience is as close to real-life as possible. How
> > >> about
> > >> > >> >> closer
> > >> > >> >> to the end of January?
> > >> > >> >>
> > >> > >> >> -Val
> > >> > >> >>
> > >> > >> >> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 8:53 PM Denis Magda <
> dma...@apache.org>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >> >>
> > >> > >> >> > Hi Val,
> > >> > >> >> >
> > >> > >> >> > That's the pace, I'll be happy to play with the alpha and
> > share
> > >> > >> >> > feedback.
> > >> > >> >> > Also, what if we arrange a community gathering after the
> > >> holidays
> > >> > to
> > >> > >> >> > demonstrate what alpha does and get more details from the
> > >> involved
> > >> > >> >> > contributors on what's coming next?
> > >> > >> >> >
> > >> > >> >> > As for the release process, yes, that needs to be a formal
> > vote
> > >> as
> > >> > >> long
> > >> > >> >> as
> > >> > >> >> > you're publishing artifacts to Maven and updating the
> website
> > >> with
> > >> > >> >> > references to the binaries and documentation pages.
> > >> > >> >> >
> > >> > >> >> >
> > >> > >> >> > -
> > >> > >> >> > Denis
> > >> > >> >> >
> > >> > >> >> >
> > >> > >> >> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 6:13 PM Valentin Kulichenko <
> > >> > >> >> > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > >> >> >
> > >> > >> >> > > Igniters,
> > >> > >> >> > >
> > >> > >> >> > > The repository for Ignite 3.x [1] was created less than a
> > >> month
> > >> > >> ago,
> > >> > >> >> and
> > >> > >> >> > we
> > >> > >> >> > > already have several merged pull requests. Many thanks to
> > >> > everyone
> > >> > >> >> > involved
> > >> > >> >> > > for the contributions!
> > >> > >> >> > >
> > >> > >> >> > > Currently, we have the following functionality available
> in
> > >> the
> > >> > >> main
> > >> > >> >> > > branch:
> > >> > >> >> > >
> > >> > >> >> > >    - New configuration framework which is compatible with
> > the
> > >> > HOCON
> > >> > >> >> > format.
> > >> > >> >> > >    - The “ignite-runner” module, which currently
> > incorporates
> > >> the
> > >> > >> >> > >    aforementioned configuration framework and REST
> endpoints
> > >> to
> > >> > >> >> interact
> > >> > >> >> > > with
> > >> > >> >> > >    the framework.
> > >> > >> >> > >    - The first version of the unified CLI tool.
> > >> > >> >> > >
> > >> > >> >> > > This set of features does not include any actual Ignite
> > APIs.
> > >> > >> >> > > However,
> > >> > >> >> it
> > >> > >> >> > > clearly demonstrates the basic mechanics of how the
> product
> > >> will
> > >> > be
> > >> > >> >> > > installed and upgraded, how the user will interact with
> it,
> > >> etc.
> > >> > I
> > >> > >> >> would
> > >> > >> >> > > like to use this to gather feedback from the community in
> > the
> > >> > early
> > >> > >> >> > stages.
> > >> > >> >> > >
> > >> > >> >> > > To make sure the experience is as close to real life as
> > >> > possible, I
> > >> > >> >> want
> > >> > >> >> > to
> > >> > >> >> > > deliver what we have as an alpha release, meaning that all
> > the
> > >> > >> >> > > required
> > >> > >> >> > > binaries will be deployed on the website and in Maven.
> There
> > >> will
> > >> > >> >> > > also
> > >> > >> >> be
> > >> > >> >> > > some basic documentation describing how to install and use
> > the
> > >> > >> >> > > product.
> > >> > >> >> > > This way, anyone will be able to download the product and
> > try
> > >> it
> > >> > >> out.
> > >> > >> >> > >
> > >> > >> >> > > My main question here -- do we need a formal vote for
> such a
> > >> > build?
> > >> > >> >> > > Or
> > >> > >> >> it
> > >> > >> >> > > can be treated as a release candidate?
> > >> > >> >> > >
> > >> > >> >> > > Any other thoughts?
> > >> > >> >> > >
> > >> > >> >> > > [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite-3
> > >> > >> >> > >
> > >> > >> >> > > -Val
> > >> > >> >> > >
> > >> > >> >> >
> > >> > >> >>
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> --
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Best regards,
> > >> > >> Ivan Pavlukhin
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to