Thank you for the information! On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 at 13:21, Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1. Transaction with label "lab2" will start. > 2. No, only one transaction in a thread. > These tests already added to PR: [1] > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7951/files > > пн, 22 июн. 2020 г. в 14:58, Guru Stron <gurustronpub...@gmail.com>: > > > Hello Alex, > > > > Thank you. Few more questions: > > > > 1. how something like this should behave: > > *client.transactions().withLabel("lab1").withLabel("lab2") * > > 2. should it be possible for a thin client to start in one thread a > > transaction with a label and without one? > > > > Thank you. > > > > ` > > > > On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 at 06:28, Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Looks like a bug. I've filled the ticket [1]. > > > > > > Thanks for your report. > > > > > > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13170 > > > > > > пн, 22 июн. 2020 г. в 02:05, Guru Stron <gurustronpub...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > To be more specific - test was added to thin client functional tests > > > > located in *org.apache.ignite.client.FunctionalTest.* > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 at 23:56, Guru Stron <gurustronpub...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear Igniters, > > > > > > > > > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that Java thin client > > > > > *client.transactions().withLabel* functionality is broken. I've > tried > > > to > > > > > add next test: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * @Test public void testTransactions1() throws Exception { > > > try > > > > > (Ignite ignite = Ignition.start(Config.getServerConfiguration()); > > > > > IgniteClient client = > > Ignition.startClient(getClientConfiguration()) > > > > > ) { ClientCache<Integer, String> cache = > > > > > client.createCache(new ClientCacheConfiguration() > > > > > .setName("cache") > > > > > .setAtomicityMode(CacheAtomicityMode.TRANSACTIONAL) ); > > > > > cache.put(0, "value0"); cache.put(1, "value1"); > > > > // > > > > > Test implicit rollback when transaction closed. try > > > > > (ClientTransaction tx = > > > > > client.transactions().withLabel("asdasda").txStart()) { > > > > > cache.put(1, "value2"); } > > assertEquals("value1", > > > > > cache.get(1));} }* > > > > > > > > > > And it fails with: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *org.junit.ComparisonFailure: Expected :value1Actual :value2* > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
