Hello Alex,
Thank you. Few more questions:
1. how something like this should behave:
*client.transactions().withLabel("lab1").withLabel("lab2") *
2. should it be possible for a thin client to start in one thread a
transaction with a label and without one?
Thank you.
`
On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 at 06:28, Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Looks like a bug. I've filled the ticket [1].
>
> Thanks for your report.
>
> [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13170
>
> пн, 22 июн. 2020 г. в 02:05, Guru Stron <gurustronpub...@gmail.com>:
>
> > To be more specific - test was added to thin client functional tests
> > located in *org.apache.ignite.client.FunctionalTest.*
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 at 23:56, Guru Stron <gurustronpub...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Igniters,
> > >
> > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that Java thin client
> > > *client.transactions().withLabel* functionality is broken. I've tried
> to
> > > add next test:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > * @Test public void testTransactions1() throws Exception {
> try
> > > (Ignite ignite = Ignition.start(Config.getServerConfiguration());
> > > IgniteClient client = Ignition.startClient(getClientConfiguration())
> > > ) { ClientCache<Integer, String> cache =
> > > client.createCache(new ClientCacheConfiguration()
> > > .setName("cache")
> > > .setAtomicityMode(CacheAtomicityMode.TRANSACTIONAL) );
> > > cache.put(0, "value0"); cache.put(1, "value1");
> > //
> > > Test implicit rollback when transaction closed. try
> > > (ClientTransaction tx =
> > > client.transactions().withLabel("asdasda").txStart()) {
> > > cache.put(1, "value2"); } assertEquals("value1",
> > > cache.get(1));} }*
> > >
> > > And it fails with:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *org.junit.ComparisonFailure: Expected :value1Actual :value2*
> > > Thank you.
> > >
> >
>
